[SR-Users] Why SDPOPS does not remove attributes in SDP

[Dmitry]

Yes, Xlog messages are triggered during calls.

 

    On Friday, June 17, 2016 6:35 PM, Fred Posner <fred at palner.com> wrote:
 

 On 06/17/2016 09:25 AM, Richard Fuchs wrote:
> On 17/06/16 03:46 AM, Dmitry wrote:
>> Hi all
>> I have the following code:
>>
>>  if($T_reply_code=="200")
>>          {
>>          if(has_body("application/sdp"))
>>              {
>>                xlog("L_INFO", "RTPENGINE received internal reply
>> $T_reply_code $rr SDP extra lines will be removed");
>>
>>                    set_rtpengine_set("0");
>>                    rtpengine_manage();
>>                  sdp_remove_line_by_prefix("a=rtcp");
>>                  sdp_remove_line_by_prefix("a=ssrc");
>>                  sdp_remove_line_by_prefix("a=ice");
>>                  sdp_remove_line_by_prefix("a=candidate");
>>
>>                  xlog("L_INFO", "RTPENGINE received internal reply
>> $T_reply_code $rr SDP extra lines removed with SDPOPS");
>>
>>              }
>>
>>          }
>> When I look through traces  - I see that 200 ok(with SDP) has all these
>> attributes and they are not removed.
>>
>> Why SDPOPS does not remove these attributes?
> 
> Probably because there's a problem rewriting parts of the SDP body more
> than once. But if you don't want ICE attributes in the output SDP, you
> can use the rtpengine flags ICE=remove. You can influence rtcp-mux
> attributes in the same way. See docs.
> 
> Cheers
> 

Are your log messages triggered?

--fred


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160617/0fcc328d/attachment.html>