[SR-Users] Checking for 200ok Response to a REGISTER request kamailio-Asterisk

[Jonathan Hunter]

Hello,
Thanks for the response.
I appreciate your comments and agree, however the architecture cannot be changed currently so in the meantime its looking to apply a fix to allow for stability in the short term.
I have built/designed other platforms and registrations don't go anywhere near the Media servers,  so it is a case of working with what we have for the short term due to a number of reasons I wont go into. :)
Understand where your coming from however.
Jon


From: oej at edvina.net
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:17:14 +0200
To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Checking for 200ok Response to a REGISTER request	kamailio-Asterisk


On 27 Jul 2016, at 14:01, Jonathan Hunter <hunterj91 at hotmail.com> wrote:Hi Guys,
So currently on our network we have a kamailio server which users register against, we then replicate the register messages to 2 Asterisk boxes sat behind it so that all entities are aware of the registration state of the users.
REGISTER--->KAMAILIO---->ASTERISK A                    ---->ASTERISK B
With a REGISTER---200OK exchange between Kamailio and Asterisk.
We have an issue where at some points the Asterisk servers when under load dont respond with a 200 ok(something being investigated)  to the register messages sent to kamailio, so I am just working on some logic for the register message to be resent using the t_replicate and t_set_fr functions.
This works well should both Asterisk servers not respond, however, as I am using replicate and it is parallel forking, if say Asterisk A answers first and is available with a 200ok then that in turn cancels the register message branch being sent to Asterisk B(which I know is fine), however  there could be a scenario where Asterisk B doesnt respond, and we wont know about it to try and resend the Register message, as the branch is cancelled.
Hope that makes sense?
I am looking at checking that both the Asterisk servers have responded and sent a 200ok, which I can grab in an onreply route but Im just wondering if someone has done something similar or has any suggestions as it is tricky to achieve currently.
I have also thought about stateless working but I really need kamailio to keep retransmitting the register until it gets a response.
Many thanks
In my view you are making a very complex solution. Why do you need to store the same registration in so many places? That’s indicating a problem in the architecture.
/O

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160727/75cd215f/attachment.html>