[SR-Users] doubt using sip tcp creating new transaction

[david]

ok thanks Daniel

i was quite confused by seeing different things on different versions
(which had sligthly configuration differences) and i though i was doing
something wrong somewhere

best regards
david


El mié, 27-01-2016 a las 14:55 +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:

> Hello,
> 
> yes, quick connect message is ok. It is an INFO level, messages to
> worry about start at level WARNING, ERROR or lower.
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> 
> 
> On 27/01/16 12:41, david wrote:
> 
> > 
> > hello Daniel
> > 
> > thanks  for the explanation.
> > then i understand the "quick connect" message is also normal? seen
> > in version 4.2.2 or 4.4?
> > 
> > best regards
> > david
> > 
> > 
> > El mar, 26-01-2016 a las 12:45 +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> > escribió:
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > the pending write message is due to asynchronous tcp --
> > > practically, even if the tcp connection is not ready, the SIP
> > > routing process is not blocked.
> > > 
> > > If the connection is found or the connection was setup quickly,
> > > then is not a risk of blocking and the message is sent
> > > immediately.
> > > 
> > > I guess all went ok with sip routing, right?
> > > 
> > > Also, tcp is separate layer from sip transactions, so no relation
> > > between them here, probably you will get the same by using the
> > > forward*() functions, which don't create sip transactions.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Daniel
> > > 
> > > On 25/01/16 15:28, david escartin wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > hello all
> > > > 
> > > > i'm facing some weird log from kamailio (i think they are weird)
> > > > when using sip tcp in the caller side and udp in the callee
> > > > side.
> > > > 
> > > > seems like the tcp socket is active in the caller side and the
> > > > call is connected, since the invite transaction completes.
> > > > After that, if we receive an in-dialog request from the callee
> > > > side, the kamailio doesnt find the tcp connection created and it
> > > > has to create again the socket by SYN procedure for the other
> > > > conn way.
> > > > up to this point i think it's everything correct.
> > > > 
> > > > A----the thing i dont understand, is that checking version
> > > > 4.2.6, the logs i have when the request in-dialog comes from
> > > > UAS, are like these
> > > > 
> > > > 5(2979) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1820]: tcp_send(): tcp_send:
> > > > no open tcp connection found, opening new one
> > > > 5(2979) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new:
> > > > new tcp connection: 79.170.68.171
> > > > 5(2979) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new():
> > > > tcpconn_new: on port 5063, type 2
> > > > 5(2979) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add():
> > > > tcpconn_add: hashes: 1522:2178:0, 4
> > > > 5(2979) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2699]: tcpconn_1st_send():
> > > > pending write on new connection 0x7fac1168f028  (-1/968 bytes
> > > > written)
> > > > 5(2979) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:395]: t_relay_to(): SER: new
> > > > transaction fwd'ed
> > > > 
> > > > B----while when using 4.2.2 or 4.4
> > > > 1(791) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no
> > > > open tcp connection found, opening new one
> > > > 1(791) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new:
> > > > new tcp connection: 79.170.68.171
> > > > 1(791) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new():
> > > > tcpconn_new: on port 5063, type 2
> > > > 1(791) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add():
> > > > tcpconn_add: hashes: 1522:3421:0, 4
> > > > 1(791) INFO: <core> [tcp_main.c:2753]: tcpconn_1st_send(): quick
> > > > connect for 0x7f880540f758
> > > > 1(791) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new
> > > > transaction fwd'ed
> > > > 
> > > > the difference between A and B is that in B i use dialog flags
> > > > to do the t_relay_to_tcp for the indialog requests (and not in
> > > > A), and in A i use the advertised IP in the listen addresses
> > > > since kamailio is behind a NAT, while B machine scenario has
> > > > public IPs.
> > > > could those 2 things explain the ebhaviour difference?
> > > > 
> > > > is there anything abnormal in the case B?
> > > > 
> > > > thanks a lot and regards
> > > > david escartin 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> > > > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> > > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> > > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> > > Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
> > > http://miconda.eu
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
> http://miconda.eu


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160127/8a0f215c/attachment.html>