[SR-Users] Forking with 404 replies

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 09:14:36 CET 2016


Hello,

if the 404 is matching an active transaction, then it should be absorbed
when there is another active branch. But if the 404 is not matching the
transaction, then it will be forwarded. You can use reply_route {} with
a t_check_trans() condition to drop the replies not matching transactions.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 13/12/2016 17:12, José Seabra wrote:
> Hi all,
> Forget my last email.
>
> This happens because the phone is sending the 404 in the wrong format.
>
> Thank you and sorry for my last email.
> Regards
> José
>
> 2016-12-13 14:40 GMT+00:00 José Seabra <joseseabra4 at gmail.com
> <mailto:joseseabra4 at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hello there,
>     I have a Kamailio server acting as registrar server and when the
>     subscriber has more than 1 AOR, kamailio sends an INVITES to each
>     AOR, if one of them replies 404 what should be the kamailio behavior:
>
>      1. should Kamailio  reply with an ACK and not pass the 404 to UAC?
>      2. should Kamailio forward the 404 to UAC?
>
>     I'm asking this because i'm facing the second behavior, that is,
>     kamailio is forwarding the 404 to UAC and the call is terminated.
>
>     -- 
>     Regards
>     José Seabra
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cumprimentos
> José Seabra
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20161219/1274d762/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list