[SR-Users] segfault when using sipt modifications
Sergey Basov
sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
Fri Aug 5 15:29:34 CEST 2016
You are welcome.
If you shure about last \x00 then you can try to edit modules/sipt/ss7_parser.c
in function isup_update_bci_1
after strings
// pointer to fixed part (2)
offset++;
add next
// fixing Media requirements to speech 0x00 or 0x01 to 64k
tmp_buf[0] = 0x00;
tmp_buf[1] = 0x0A;
tmp_buf[2] = 0x00;
replace_body_segment(mangle, offset-4, 3, tmp_buf, 3);
and recompile sipt module. This will change your "Forward Call
Indicators: 0x4800" (last 00) and "Transmission medium requirement: 0
(speech)"
--
Best regards,
Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
tel: (+38067) 403-62-54
2016-08-05 15:59 GMT+03:00 david <descartin at bts.io>:
> yes, that's x00 it's actually the only one well interpreted by kamailio :)
>
> thanks for the help in this issue Sergey
>
>
>
> El vie, 05-08-2016 a las 15:01 +0300, Sergey Basov escribió:
>
> Hello.
>
> Most important, i think, is the las \x00 which is the flag end of ISUP
> message...
> Without it you cant generate correct ISUP part..
>
> Look in wireshark. It will inform you about any error in ISUP.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>
> tel: (+38067) 403-62-54
>
>
> 2016-08-05 11:07 GMT+03:00 david <descartin at bts.io>:
>> Hello
>>
>> that would be great, despite not needing it now, it would be great, there
>> are 3 x00 in the isup i wanted to set, but 2 are from FCI and optional
>> FCI,
>> and the third is for the called party, which can be changed with sipt
>> functions.
>> anycase, the FCI could be an issue in some scenarios, so an option to let
>> the kamailio get the x00 would be great
>>
>> besides, i have another issue with textops, setting body multipart
>>
>> Aug 3 11:11:03 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4190]: INFO: <core>
>> [msg_translator.c:1692]: get_boundary(): Content-Type hdr has no params
>> <application/sdp>
>> Aug 3 11:11:03 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4190]: WARNING: <core>
>> [msg_translator.c:1958]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): check_boundaries
>> error
>>
>> but i think there is already another query with this so i will check there
>>
>> best regards
>> david
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> El mar, 02-08-2016 a las 09:22 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> maybe the function append_body_part("...") can be extended with an extra
>> parameter where to specify the character to be replaced with 0x00 in the
>> first parameter.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/16 16:34, Sergey Basov wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Look more carefuly, its only first \x00 changes forward call indicator.
>> You
>> have a few more \x00...
>>
>> You does not get full ISUP into INVITE...
>>
>> As I have told earlier you can replace \x00 by \x01into kamailio script,
>> but
>> you must rewrite it with \x00 later into sip-t module, but this requires
>> some changes into source code of sip-t module...
>>
>> sip-t module itself designed for checking/modifying of the ISUP content
>> into
>> sip-t/sip-i, but not for generating it...
>>
>>
>> 1 авг. 2016 г. 5:08 PM пользователь "david" <descartin at bts.io> написал:
>>
>> Hello Sergey, Daniel
>>
>> thanks a lot for the guidance.
>> i changed the x00 by x01 and it works now, i was seeing the ISUP truncated
>> but i thought it was related to the tshark XD
>>
>> i will find out about the changes needed at sipt configuration, but just
>> in
>> case, the things chaged by this only are the forward call indicators, so i
>> hope that does give us many problems....
>>
>> i will let you know anything
>>
>> thanks and best regards
>> david
>>
>>
>> El lun, 01-08-2016 a las 12:09 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am not familiar with isup and no testbed around at this moment. That's
>> why I asked for backtrace from the coredump file, based on the
>> guidelines I did in my previous email.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/16 09:07, Sergey Basov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> try make dump packet after
>>>
>>>
>>> append_body_part("\x01\x12\x49\x00\x0a\x03\x02\x0a\x08\x84\x90\x33\x41\x72\x17\x00\x06\x0a\x08\x04\x13\x93\x70\x21\x73\x23\x10\x08\x01\x00\x00","application/isup;version=itu-t92+","signal;handling=optional");
>>> before sipt_destination($rU, 31, 4);
>>>
>>> when i have done such conversion i found that kamailio from script
>>> ignores all string content after symbol \x00 as this is end of line.
>>>
>>> To avoid this i have replaces \x00 with \x01 in my initial ISUP string
>>> and make changes into SIP-T module to replace it with \x00 while
>>> processing message. before number/presentation/screening
>>> modifications.
>>>
>>> you have first \x00 as forth symbol in your ISUP string and after it
>>> all have to be ignored. Look at dump using wireshark. I think you will
>>> see mailformed ISUP incapsulated message.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>>>
>>> tel: (+38067) 403-62-54
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-08-01 8:21 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> would be good to get a core dump file and the backtrace from it in order
>>>> to
>>>> see where it crashes.
>>>>
>>>> For getting the coredump, try:
>>>>
>>>> - stop kamailio
>>>>
>>>> - do: ulimit -c unlimited
>>>>
>>>> - start kamailio as root
>>>>
>>>> - reproduce the issue
>>>>
>>>> A corefile should be generated in / or working directory. Use gdb to
>>>> grab
>>>> the output of 'bt full' from the corefile and send it here to the
>>>> mailing
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29/07/16 18:21, david wrote:
>>>>
>>>> hello all
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i'm trying to add a ISUP multipart in a regular call using the textops
>>>> module, and despite seeing one previous issue int he mail list, i'm
>>>> finding
>>>> some issue here
>>>>
>>>> i'm using this commands
>>>>
>>>> msg_apply_changes();
>>>> set_body_multipart(,"2123894789_1257887457");
>>>> msg_apply_changes();
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> append_body_part("\x01\x12\x49\x00\x0a\x03\x02\x0a\x08\x84\x90\x33\x41\x72\x17\x00\x06\x0a\x08\x04\x13\x93\x70\x21\x73\x23\x10\x08\x01\x00\x00","application/isup;version=itu-t92+","signal;handling=optional");
>>>> msg_apply_changes();
>>>> sipt_destination($rU, 31, 4);
>>>> sipt_set_calling($fU, 4, 0, 3);
>>>> msg_apply_changes();
>>>>
>>>> before the record_route command, and when using sipt_destination($rU,
>>>> 31,
>>>> 4); i'm getting asegfault
>>>>
>>>> here you have the logs
>>>> could you please give me any clue about something i'm missing or doing
>>>> wrong?
>>>>
>>>> thanks alot and regards
>>>> david
>>>>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): SIP
>>>> Request:
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): method:
>>>> <INVITE>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): uri:
>>>> <sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): version:
>>>> <SIP/2.0>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param():
>>>> Found
>>>> param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param():
>>>> Found
>>>> param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7ma5t4FKS0SKa>; state=16
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of
>>>> header
>>>> reached, state=5
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers():
>>>> parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>>>> parse_headers: this is the first via
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:178]: receive_msg(): After
>>>> parse_msg...
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:221]: receive_msg(): preparing to run
>>>> routing scripts...
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 65
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]:
>>>> parse_addr_spec():
>>>> end of header reached, state=10
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> get_hdr_field: <To> [49];
>>>> uri=[sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> to
>>>> body [<sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone>
>>>> ]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <94568362> <INVITE>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> get_hdr_body : content_length=104
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found
>>>> end
>>>> of header
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:172]: parse_to_param():
>>>> DEBUG: add_param: tag=5jBBFae4D90rg
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]:
>>>> parse_addr_spec():
>>>> end of header reached, state=29
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:248]: w_sanity_check(): sanity
>>>> checks
>>>> result: 1
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:564]: grep_sock_info(): checking
>>>> if
>>>> host==us: 13==13 && [79.170.71.132] == [79.170.71.132]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:567]: grep_sock_info(): checking
>>>> if
>>>> port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg:
>>>> msg
>>>> id=1 global id=0 T start=0xffffffffffffffff
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request():
>>>> t_lookup_request:
>>>> start searching: hash=46859, isACK=0
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261
>>>> transaction matching failed
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG:
>>>> t_lookup_request: no transaction found
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg:
>>>> msg
>>>> id=1 global id=1 T end=(nil)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1312]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg
>>>> id=1 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request():
>>>> t_lookup_request:
>>>> start searching: hash=46859, isACK=0
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261
>>>> transaction matching failed
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG:
>>>> t_lookup_request: no transaction found
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:358]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG:
>>>> trans=0x7fb3fb0c64e0, callback type 1, id 0 entered
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5
>>>> calculated:
>>>> 5ea9736b3bdcf90a4c3043a5a492b31f
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [select.c:412]: run_select(): Calling SELECT
>>>> 0x7fb404252ef8
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: Theseus-Test Call 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208 /
>>>> Call-ID 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: Call-ID =
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:643]: app_lua_run(): reload
>>>> deactivated
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:644]: app_lua_run(): executing
>>>> Lua
>>>> function: [[allow_src_uri]]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:645]: app_lua_run(): lua top
>>>> index
>>>> is: 4
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>>>> $avp(s:call_obj)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:call_obj)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get: $ci
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar [$ci]
>>>> found
>>>> in
>>>> cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $var(authorized)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$var(authorized)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: Theseus-Test Call 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208 /
>>>> Call-ID 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: Method INVITE from
>>>> 79.170.64.130:5080 authorized
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: Theseus-Test Call 58825 / Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: Object 58825 assigned to Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: Theseus-Test Call 58825 / Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: The call has been sent to RG
>>>> 106406
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:643]: app_lua_run(): reload
>>>> deactivated
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:644]: app_lua_run(): executing
>>>> Lua
>>>> function: [[get_rg_info]]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:645]: app_lua_run(): lua top
>>>> index
>>>> is: 4
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get: $ci
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar [$ci]
>>>> found
>>>> in
>>>> cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>>>> $avp(s:call_obj)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:call_obj)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>>>> $shv(flag_list)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>>>> [$shv(flag_list)]
>>>> added in cache
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG 106406 attributes:
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 description =
>>>> PBX--NOC-TEST
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 admin_status = 1
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 cir_direction = 2
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 ani_posttranslation
>>>> =
>>>> 0
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406
>>>> ani_posttranslation_table = 0
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 posttranslation = 1
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406
>>>> posttranslation_table
>>>> =
>>>> 106384
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 pound = 2
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 gw_port = 5060
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 custom_flags = None
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $avp(s:description)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:882]: parse_avp_ident(): Parsing
>>>> 's:description'
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:description)] added in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $avp(s:admin_status)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:admin_status)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $avp(s:cir_direction)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:882]: parse_avp_ident(): Parsing
>>>> 's:cir_direction'
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:cir_direction)] added in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $avp(s:ani_posttranslation_table)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:ani_posttranslation_table)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $avp(s:posttranslation_table)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:posttranslation_table)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $avp(s:pound)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:pound)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $avp(s:gw_ip)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:gw_ip)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>>>> $avp(s:gw_port)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>>>> [$avp(s:gw_port)] found in cache
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 /
>>>> Call-ID
>>>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: Custom flags = None
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>>>> $shv(custom_flag_list)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>>>> [$shv(custom_flag_list)] added in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>>>> $shv(custom_flag_list_branch)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>>>> [$shv(custom_flag_list_branch)] added in cache
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textopsx [textopsx.c:231]: msg_apply_changes_f(): SIP
>>>> message content updated - reparsing
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): SIP
>>>> Request:
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): method:
>>>> <INVITE>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): uri:
>>>> <sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): version:
>>>> <SIP/2.0>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param():
>>>> Found
>>>> param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param():
>>>> Found
>>>> param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7ma5t4FKS0SKa>; state=16
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of
>>>> header
>>>> reached, state=5
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers():
>>>> parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>>>> parse_headers: this is the first via
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1577]: set_multibody_helper():
>>>> delimiter<21>:[2123894789_1257887457]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]:
>>>> parse_addr_spec():
>>>> end of header reached, state=10
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> get_hdr_field: <To> [49];
>>>> uri=[sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> to
>>>> body [<sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone>
>>>> ]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <94568362> <INVITE>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> get_hdr_body : content_length=104
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found
>>>> end
>>>> of header
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1486]: generate_boundary(): adding
>>>> final
>>>> CRLF+CRLF
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1714]: set_multibody_helper():
>>>> content-type<48>:[multipart/mixed;boundary="2123894789_1257887457"]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1768]: set_multibody_helper(): set
>>>> flag
>>>> FL_BODY_MULTIPART
>>>> 5(24552) INFO: <core> [msg_translator.c:1692]: get_boundary():
>>>> Content-Type
>>>> hdr has no params <application/sdp>
>>>> 5(24552) WARNING: <core> [msg_translator.c:1958]:
>>>> build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): check_boundaries error
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:422]: clen_builder():
>>>> content-length: 189 (189)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textopsx [textopsx.c:231]: msg_apply_changes_f(): SIP
>>>> message content updated - reparsing
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): SIP
>>>> Request:
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): method:
>>>> <INVITE>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): uri:
>>>> <sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): version:
>>>> <SIP/2.0>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param():
>>>> Found
>>>> param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param():
>>>> Found
>>>> param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7ma5t4FKS0SKa>; state=16
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of
>>>> header
>>>> reached, state=5
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers():
>>>> parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>>>> parse_headers: this is the first via
>>>> 5(24552) ERROR: <core> [lvalue.c:345]: lval_pvar_assign(): non existing
>>>> right pvar
>>>> 5(24552) ERROR: <core> [lvalue.c:405]: lval_assign(): assignment failed
>>>> at
>>>> pos: (390,18-390,44)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]:
>>>> parse_addr_spec():
>>>> end of header reached, state=10
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> get_hdr_field: <To> [49];
>>>> uri=[sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> to
>>>> body [<sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone>
>>>> ]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <94568362> <INVITE>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> get_hdr_body : content_length=189
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found
>>>> end
>>>> of header
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1486]: generate_boundary(): adding
>>>> final
>>>> CRLF+CRLF
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:1719]: get_boundary(): boundary
>>>> is
>>>> <--2123894789_1257887457>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:1839]: check_boundaries(): last
>>>> bondary without -- at the end
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:1639]: replace_body(): old size
>>>> body[189] actual[319]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:422]: clen_builder():
>>>> content-length: 319 (319)
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textopsx [textopsx.c:231]: msg_apply_changes_f(): SIP
>>>> message content updated - reparsing
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): SIP
>>>> Request:
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): method:
>>>> <INVITE>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): uri:
>>>> <sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): version:
>>>> <SIP/2.0>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param():
>>>> Found
>>>> param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param():
>>>> Found
>>>> param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7ma5t4FKS0SKa>; state=16
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of
>>>> header
>>>> reached, state=5
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers():
>>>> parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>>>> parse_headers: this is the first via
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]:
>>>> parse_addr_spec():
>>>> end of header reached, state=10
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> get_hdr_field: <To> [49];
>>>> uri=[sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> to
>>>> body [<sip:34666988297 at 79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone>
>>>> ]
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <94568362> <INVITE>
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field():
>>>> DEBUG:
>>>> get_hdr_body : content_length=319
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_body.c:87]: get_boundary_param():
>>>> boundary is "2123894789_1257887457"
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found
>>>> end
>>>> of header
>>>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_body.c:87]: get_boundary_param():
>>>> boundary is "2123894789_1257887457"
>>>> 5(24552) CRITICAL: <core> [data_lump.c:297]: del_lump(): offset + len
>>>> exceeds message size (1176 + 51 > 1201)
>>>> 35(24582) CRITICAL: <core> [pass_fd.c:275]: receive_fd(): EOF on 17
>>>> 35(24582) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3448]: handle_ser_child(): dead
>>>> child
>>>> 5,
>>>> pid 24552 (shutting down?)
>>>> 35(24582) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:598]: io_watch_del(): DBG:
>>>> io_watch_del
>>>> (0xa2ae40, 17, -1, 0x0) fd_no=39 called
>>>> 0(24547) ALERT: <core> [main.c:739]: handle_sigs(): child process 24552
>>>> exited by a signal 6
>>>> 0(24547) ALERT: <core> [main.c:742]: handle_sigs(): core was not
>>>> generated
>>>> 0(24547) INFO: <core> [main.c:754]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to
>>>> SIGCHLD
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: <core> [main.c:756]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to
>>>> SIGCHLD
>>>> 34(24581) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 33(24580) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 32(24579) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 31(24578) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 30(24577) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 29(24576) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 28(24575) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 27(24574) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 26(24573) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 25(24572) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 24(24571) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 23(24570) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 22(24569) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 21(24568) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 20(24567) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 19(24566) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 18(24565) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 17(24564) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 16(24563) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 15(24562) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 14(24561) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 13(24560) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 12(24559) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 11(24558) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 10(24557) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 9(24556) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 8(24555) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 7(24554) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 6(24553) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 4(24551) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 3(24550) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 2(24549) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 1(24548) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 35(24582) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2014]: mod_destroy():
>>>> rtpengine_hash_table_destroy() success!
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: db_text [dbtext.c:110]: destroy(): destroy ...
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:86]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown :
>>>> start
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:89]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown :
>>>> emptying hash table
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:127]: free_cell_helper(): freeing
>>>> transaction
>>>> 0x7fb3fb0c64e0 from h_table.c:449
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:91]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown :
>>>> removing semaphores
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:93]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown :
>>>> destroying tmcb lists
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:96]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown :
>>>> done
>>>> 0(24547) INFO: <core> [sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API
>>>> not
>>>> initialized
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm.c:174]: shm_core_lock_destroy():
>>>> destroying
>>>> the shared memory lock
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm.c:266]: shm_destroy_manager():
>>>> destroying
>>>> memory manager: f_malloc
>>>> 0(24547) DEBUG: <core> [mem/pkg.c:89]: pkg_destroy_manager(): destroying
>>>> memory manager: f_malloc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>> http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list