[SR-Users] Record-route on sequential requests

[Kristian F. Høgh]

Hi again,

Sorry, false alarm...
We had a patch which disabled the callback from dialog to RR.

Regards,
Kristian.


On Friday 27 November 2015 12:54:50 Kristian F. Høgh wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> Record-route on sequential requests doesn't have did/vsf parm.
> 
> On initial INVITE, I call record_route() and set dialog flag.
> kamailio adds the following RR
> Record-Route: <sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2>
> 
> UAC sends a re-INVITE, containing the following route:
> Route: <sip:178.21.251.54;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2>
> I call loose_route() followed by record-route(), and kamailio adds the following RR:
> Record-Route: <sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df>
> 
> I've got a phone which updates the routeset on sequential requests (which I don't think it should) and the did-matching fails.
> Should kamailio add did/vsf on sequential requests, when I call record_route()?
> Should I set dlg_match_mode to 1? (I use 0)
> Is it wrong to call record_route() from sequential requests?
> 
> Which way is the best to resolve the problem?
> 
> Regards,
> Kristian Høgh
> Uni-tel A/S
> 


*Kristian Høgh*
 

 
Telefon: 4422 8822
support at uni-tel.dk[1]
 
Gydevang 19 | 3450 Allerød
www.uni-tel.dk [2]

--------
[1] mailto:support at uni-tel.dk
[2] http://www.uni-tel.dk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20151127/66300e29/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mail-logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11635 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20151127/66300e29/attachment.png>