[SR-Users] Branch & Forking

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Mon Nov 9 11:57:53 CET 2015


Hello,

the aggregation of replies for a parallel fork is done automatically and
negative responses are absorbed.

Can you send a ngrep trace of a call where you found that the negative
response of a branch is not absorbed in case a branch answered?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 05/11/15 16:41, Marino Mileti wrote:
> I'm playing with branch and i'm using this simple route (copied from kamailio website)
>
> route {
>   seturi("sip:a at example.com");
>   append_branch("sip:b at example.com"); 
>   append_branch("sip:c at example.com");
>   t_relay();
>   break;
> }
>
> A B & C rings at the same time.
>
> If B or C aren't registered, and the caller send a CANCEL, it receives also a 404 messsage because for example B wasn't online.
>
> Is it possible that Kamailio "absorb" this 404? I don't want that my caller receive it :)
>  
> Marino Maria Mileti
> marino.mileti at alice.it
>
>
> ---
> Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat




More information about the sr-users mailing list