[SR-Users] dmq_usrloc for writing to DB on one machine

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 27/10/15 12:17, Sebastian Damm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when inspecting dmq a bit further, I found that in fact there is an
> autodiscovery built in. When I told registrar 1 and registrar 2 to
> send to receiver, and told receiver to only send to itself, everything
> worked. Until the receiver went offline. Then it got disabled by the
> registrars and no packets got replicated anymore after it came back
> online until the registrars were restarted, too.
>
> Since we don't want this situation, I told the receiver to send to a
> dns record containing all registrars. This way, after the receiver
> came back up, the registrars got notified and started replicating
> their usrloc again. But they didn't send to the receiver only, but
> also to the other registrar.
>
> Since we have quite an amount of registration traffic on the
> registrars (and actually there are more than two of them), we don't
> want to send this traffic multiple times through our network.
>
> Is there any way we can force the dmq module to send only to the
> configured receiver?
I guess a patch to add a mod parameter to control this behaviour needs
to be done. I expect to not be something complex to implement.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat