[SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Mon May 18 08:59:59 CEST 2015


Hello,

but fix_nated_sdp() is changing the SDP (body) not Contact header. Maybe
you had fix_nated_contact(). If yes, you should use set_contact_alias()
instead, along with handle_ruri_alias() -- see default kamailio.cfg for
version 4.2 for a sample of how to use these two functions.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 18/05/15 08:31, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote:
> It appears the ACK had an R-URI from original INVITE and wasn't using
> the IP address in the new Contact from the 200 OK.
>
> Commented out a call to fix_nated_sdp(); which resolved this case, now
> completing a round of testing to check whether any new faults have
> been introduced from the change.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [miconda at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, 16 May 2015 3:57 AM
> *To:* Darren Campbell (Primar); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch
>
> Yes, you can send me directly, just notify here so I will look in the
> global inbox, because I check it quire rarely -- I is a lot of
> unsolicited emails I get there and I have filters for the mailing
> list, so if no filter is selecting the email to put it in a dedicated
> folder, it may take ages to look at it if I am not aware of being sent.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 15/05/15 04:51, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote:
>> Thank you Daniel, is it OK to send these logs directly to you? I'd
>> prefer to not disclose them to the list.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [miconda at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 12 May 2015 7:03 PM
>> *To:* Darren Campbell (Primar); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/15 10:06, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote:
>>> Here's the full conversation. Makes me wonder whether the ACK needs
>>> to go back to the same host that handled the INVITE or whether it
>>> should be returned to the host mentioned in "c=IN IP4
>>> PROVIDERMEDIAIP" in the 200 OK.
>> You still gave the conversation in one side, towards the provider.
>> You need to get the traffic from caller side as well, which is
>> listening on 127.0.0.1, but it is important to see what that side
>> sends and receives. You have to grab the traffic on lo interface as well.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>> -- 
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
>> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150518/d5082d5b/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list