[SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Slava Bendersky
volga629 at networklab.ca
Tue Mar 24 00:29:21 CET 2015
Hello Everyone,
In my case I am using Path and I asterisk generate NOTIFY with route based on path, then I see on kamailio side tries reach on client on public IP side and open new connection not follow ESTABLISHED/RELATED link then it times out.
Log:
Mar 23 11:00:17 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20193]: INFO: <script>: [NOTIFY], Inbound connection from <10.18.130.51> traffic from Asterisk
Mar 23 11:00:17 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20193]: INFO: <script>: [NOTIFY], Present Route: Client_public_IP.
Mar 23 11:00:28 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20204]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect Client_public_IP:5060 failed (timeout)
Here trace on kamailio side
http://fpaste.org/201813/15287114/
Here trace from soft phone client side.
http://fpaste.org/201814/14271530/
Slava.
From: "Alex Balashov" <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
To: "sr-users" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 6:42:59 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Anthony,
The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is:
m: "Test User"
<sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUYoeUeQ8Cw.6DE2vDdyJDAa4TliwC84OC82LK-2ehwl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUAm6UYzm0gme>;+sip.ice
And the subsequent NOTIFY is correctly targeted to this RURI:
NOTIFY
sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUYoeUeQ8Cw.6DE2vDdyJDAa4TliwC84OC82LK-2ehwl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUAm6UYzm0gme
SIP/2.0
The subscriber returns this Contact in the 200 OK response for the NOTIFY:
m: "Test User"
<sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUYoeUeQ8Cw.6DE2vDdyJDAa4TliwC84O>;+sip.ice
And subsequent NOTIFYs appear to use this RURI instead of the original
Contact of the subscriber:
NOTIFY
sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUYoeUeQ8Cw.6DE2vDdyJDAa4TliwC84O
SIP/2.0
NOTIFY
sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUYoeUeQ8Cw.6DE2vDdyJDAa4TliwC84O
SIP/2.0
etc.
A SUBSCRIBE is a dialog-creating event, so in-dialog messages (e.g.
NOTIFYs) should be targeted at a Request URI corresponding to the
Contact URI of the SUBSCRIBE-er. It seems to me that this is the problem
here, rather than truncation.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150323/dc2c3dab/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list