[SR-Users] Dialog order of operations

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 09/03/15 22:40, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Thanks for that insight. This does make me wonder if there are other
> unforeseen implications in suspending/continue TM transactions, in
> terms of "baggage" associated with the transaction or message, but not
> part of the core TM structure, not making it across the
> suspend/continue gap.
>
X/AVPs and flags are taken over, being the attributes associated with
transaction/message. Anything else that is in the context of the local
process (e.g., $var(xyz)) are lost.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com