[SR-Users] TLS conversion

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

doesn't the ACK have a Route header for K1 and double Route headers for
K2? K1 should use the first Route of K2 for routing, not the R-URI.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 03/03/15 05:14, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> I have 2 kamailio servers and 1 asterisk server.
>
> 1. asterisk calls kamailio1
> 2. kamailio1 relays INVITE to kamailio2
> 3. kamailio2 relays INVITE to client registered using TLS
> 4. client answers with 200 OK, sends to kamailio2
> 5. kamailio2 relays 200 OK to kamailio1
> 6. kamailio1 relays 200 OK to asterisk
> 7. asterisk sends ACK to kamailio1
> 8. kamailio1 complains "forward_request(): forward_req: ERROR: cannot
> forward to af 2, proto 3 no corresponding listening socket" which is
> because 200 OK has a contact header with tls transport from client
> 9. call drops in 30 secs which is expected because client never
> received the ACK
>
> any ideas on a fix or workaround?
>
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150303/9cbe7f58/attachment.html>