[SR-Users] Kamailio LCR Multiple choices

[Ali Taher]

Hi Juha,

Below are LCR tables input data

Lcr_gw table :
(id, lcr_id,  gw_name,  ip_addr, hostname, port, params, uri_scheme,
transport, strip, prefix, tag, flags, defunct)
1, 1, 'gw1', '192.168.26.4', '192.168.26.4', 5060, '', 1, 1, 0, null,null,
1,null
2, 1, 'gw2', '192.168.26.1', '192.168.26.1', 5060, '', 1, 1, 0, null,null,
1,null
3, 1, 'gw3', '192.168.26.6', '192.168.26.6', 5060, '', 1, 1, 0, null,null,
1,null

LCR_rule target:
(id,lcr_id, prefix,from_uri,request_uri, stopper, enabled)
1, 1, '961', null,null, 1, 1

LCR_rule_target table :
(id,lcr_id ,rule_id,gw_id,priority,weight)
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2
3, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3

Thanks
Ali

-----Original Message-----
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Juha Heinanen
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 11:32 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR Multiple choices

Ali Taher writes:

> Yes I know , I gave 192.168.26.4 smaller priority , then 192.168.26.1 
> then 192.168.26.6.
> So in this way gateways must be ordered as 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 
> , 192.168.26.6.
> Yet I got them ordered as 192.168.26.6, 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 , 
> 192.168.26.6.
> If as you're saying it's sorting issue , then why I got 192.168.26.6 
> gateway twice (at the first and at the end).

as i mentioned, it is not possible to say anything based on the above
information.  you need to check your lcr tables, especially lcr_rule_target
table.

-- juha

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users