[SR-Users] t_suspend()/t_continue() problem

[Dmytro Bogovych]

Found similar question in archives - so workarounded with $ru modification.
Thank you!

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Dmytro Bogovych
<dmytro.bogovych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I found problem.
> The resumed INVITE transaction was sent to LOCATION route instead of RELAY.
>
> However I see another problem now - t_relay() attempts to send resumed
> transaction to bad destination address.
>
> Jan  2 13:41:37 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[18186]: ERROR: tm
> [../../forward.h:227]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed
> Jan  2 13:41:37 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[18186]: ERROR: tm
> [t_fwd.c:1608]: t_send_branch(): ERROR: t_send_branch: sending request
> on branch 0 failed
> Jan  2 13:41:37 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[18186]: ERROR: sl
> [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used:
> Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL)
>
> I tried to workaround it with t_relay_to_udp/tcp/tls(ip, port)
> However kamailio reports
> function t_relay_to_udp: parameter 1 is not constant
>
> The problem line is:
> if (!t_relay_to_udp($var(rr_ip), $var(rr_port))) sl_reply_error();
>
> Does it mean t_relay_to_udp() accepts only constant values?
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Dmytro Bogovych
> <dmytro.bogovych at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Greetings.
>> I'm trying to adopt kamailio to handle incoming calls / generate push
>> notifications for softphone running on Windows Phone 8.
>> Starting point was this publication
>> http://www.kamailio.org/events/2014-KamailioWorld/day2/26-Daniel-Constantin.Mierla-Kamailio.cfg-Async.pdf
>>
>> I adopted the script from publication a bit - now notification URI is
>> extracted from REGISTER messages + INVITE transactions are not
>> resuming when unregistering happens.
>>
>> However it does not work for me yet.
>> I see the suspicious output in kamailio log when softphone registers
>> after incoming push notification.
>> Please ignore ERROR: level name - it is just dirty logging call, not
>> real problem.
>>
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: ERROR:
>> <script>: resuming trasaction [40951:63820139] dbogovych
>> (40951:63820139)
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: tm
>> [t_lookup.c:1635]: t_lookup_ident(): DEBUG: t_lookup_ident:
>> transaction found
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG:
>> registrar [lookup.c:181]: lookup(): contact for [dbogovych] found by
>> address
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG:
>> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 90211984
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG:
>> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 91061218
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG:
>> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 91229062
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG:
>> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 90750343
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG:
>> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 87612750
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG:
>> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 91841578
>> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: WARNING:
>> tm [t_lookup.c:1537]: t_unref(): WARNING: script writer didn't release
>> transaction
>>
>> Can this "script writer didn't release transaction" be the problem?
>>
>> Thank you :)