[SR-Users] cnxcc serial fork
kelchy at gmail.com
Sun Sep 7 06:35:12 CEST 2014
i am not sure if this is related but, there are cases when if a user adds
credit, it does not reflect on cnxcc.active_clients
after the next call. somehow, cnxcc saves the old credit and does not
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz <
carlos.ruizdiaz at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kelvin,
> this is an interesting scenario. I will have to reproduce it myself in
> order to reply you properly.
> Answering your question, yes, it should be updated to 200. Let me check
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Kelvin Chua <kelchy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi carlos,
>> i have a serial forking scenario to several providers as failover. and i
>> used cnxcc_set_max_credit to control the session credit/time.
>> just wanted to make sure it does what i think it should do so i made a
>> little experiment.
>> the logic goes this way.
>> 1. cnxcc_set_max_credit -> $100, cost per second -> $1
>> 2. call will fail, try the next provider
>> 3. cnxcc_set_max_credit -> $200, cost per second -> $2
>> what i am expecting to see is, if i do
>> kamctl kamcmd cnxcc.active_clients
>> i would see $200 as the max_amount. but in kamailio 4.1.5, i still see
>> $100, should it
>> be updated to $200? is there an override in cnxcc_set_max_credit when
>> called twice or after failure_route?
>> Kelvin Chua
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> +52 55 3048 3303
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sr-users