[SR-Users] Hash Table capacity

Vik Killa vipkilla at gmail.com
Mon Oct 20 17:17:53 CEST 2014


Why isn't htable designed to use separate chains to avoid collisions
altogether?

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Olle E. Johansson <oej at edvina.net> wrote:

>
> 19 aug 2013 kl. 17:02 skrev Elena-Ramona Modroiu <ramona at asipto.com>:
>
> On 8/19/13 4:05 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> According the docs, the hash table is restricted to a maximum size of 2^16
> (65536) buckets.
>
> it was restricted to 2^14, I just lifted it to positive integer range 2^31
> because it is easier to get now systems with plenty of memory -- it will be
> in next major release.
>
>
> This is so typical of Open Source. Someone highlights a limitation or a
> problem and moments later a developer fixes it.
>
> Thank you everyone - reporters and developer!
>
> Kamailio has a great team working with the code.
>
> /O
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20141020/99295389/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list