[SR-Users] kamailio 4.2 ,have some problems when use mysql db

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Mon Oct 20 12:28:30 CEST 2014


I tracked down the path, which is confirmed by this trace. From the logs
can be seen that it is just next chunk in memory.

Can you send the output from gdb of:

frame 2
p *f

Daniel

On 20/10/14 12:16, 张顺通 wrote:
> 4.2.0  have a core
>
> #0  0x00007ffff7488265 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> No symbol table info available.
> #1  0x00007ffff7489d10 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> No symbol table info available.
> #2  0x0000000000615b74 in qm_debug_frag (qm=0x7ffff6c55010,
> f=0x7ffff6cdcf08) at mem/q_malloc.c:161
>         __FUNCTION__ = "qm_debug_frag"
> #3  0x0000000000616d87 in qm_malloc (qm=0x7ffff6c55010, size=56,
> file=0x7ffff5fedef8 "<core>: db_res.c", func=0x7ffff5fee288
> "db_new_result", line=112)
>     at mem/q_malloc.c:388
>         f = 0x7ffff6cdcf08
>         hash = 2057
>         list_cntr = 1
>         __FUNCTION__ = "qm_malloc"
> #4  0x00007ffff5fdaa2f in db_new_result () at db_res.c:112
>         r = 0x0
>         __FUNCTION__ = "db_new_result"
> #5  0x00007ffff6a386d6 in db_mysql_new_result () at km_res.c:235
>         obj = 0x0
>         __FUNCTION__ = "db_mysql_new_result"
> #6  0x00007ffff6a29c7a in db_mysql_store_result (_h=0x7ffff6cb4e78,
> _r=0x7fffffffdf38) at km_dbase.c:227
>         code = -165731152
>         __FUNCTION__ = "db_mysql_store_result"
> #7  0x00007ffff5fd3516 in db_do_query_internal (_h=0x7ffff6cb4e78,
> _k=0x7fffffffdf70, _op=0x0, _v=0x7fffffffdf40, _c=0x7fffffffdf60,
> _n=1, _nc=1, _o=0x0,
>     _r=0x7fffffffdf38, val2str=0x7ffff6a39374 <db_mysql_val2str>,
> submit_query=0x7ffff6a2825c <db_mysql_submit_query>,
>     store_result=0x7ffff6a2998c <db_mysql_store_result>, _l=0) at
> db_query.c:137
>         tmp = 32767
>         off = 63
>         ret = 23
>         __FUNCTION__ = "db_do_query_internal"
> #8  0x00007ffff5fd3fbd in db_do_query (_h=0x7ffff6cb4e78,
> _k=0x7fffffffdf70, _op=0x0, _v=0x7fffffffdf40, _c=0x7fffffffdf60,
> _n=1, _nc=1, _o=0x0, _r=0x7fffffffdf38,
>     val2str=0x7ffff6a39374 <db_mysql_val2str>,
> submit_query=0x7ffff6a2825c <db_mysql_submit_query>,
> store_result=0x7ffff6a2998c <db_mysql_store_result>)
>     at db_query.c:156
> No locals.
> #9  0x00007ffff6a2b04e in db_mysql_query (_h=0x7ffff6cb4e78,
> _k=0x7fffffffdf70, _op=0x0, _v=0x7fffffffdf40, _c=0x7fffffffdf60,
> _n=1, _nc=1, _o=0x0, _r=0x7fffffffdf38)
>     at km_dbase.c:323
> No locals.
> #10 0x00007ffff5fcd6e9 in db_table_version (dbf=0x7ffff2d1e3c0,
> connection=0x7ffff6cb4e78, table=0x7ffff2d1d990) at db.c:400
>         key = {0x7fffffffdf20}
>         col = {0x7fffffffdf10}
>         val = {{type = DB1_STR, nul = 0, free = -167987365, val =
> {int_val = -223246127, ll_val = 140737265109201, double_val =
> 6.9533447780108125e-310,
>               time_val = 140737265109201, string_val = 0x7ffff2b188d1
> "dispatcher", str_val = {s = 0x7ffff2b188d1 "dispatcher", len = 10},
> blob_val = {s = 0x7ffff2b188d1 "dispatcher", len = 10}, bitmap_val =
> 4071721169}}}
>         res = 0x0
>         ver = 0x0
>         version = 0x9c7be0
>         tmp1 = {s = 0x7ffff5feb0e1 "table_name", len = 10}
>         tmp2 = {s = 0x7ffff5feb0ec "table_version", len = 13}
>         ret = 8
>         __FUNCTION__ = "db_table_version"
> #11 0x00007ffff2aeab2f in init_ds_db () at dispatch.c:666
>         ret = 297
>         __FUNCTION__ = "init_ds_db"
> #12 0x00007ffff2b04434 in mod_init () at dispatcher.c:317
>         avp_spec = {type = 48, getf = 0x7fffffffe190, setf =
> 0x7fffffffe0d0, pvp = {pvn = {type = 16, nfree = 0x3000000028, u =
> {isname = {type = -7760, name = {
>                     n = 7292328, s = {s = 0x6f45a8 "DEBUG", len =
> 7555677}, re = 0x6f45a8}}, dname = 0x3ffffe1b0}}, pvi = {type =
> 7555621, u = {ival = -223246127,
>                 dval = 0x7ffff2b188d1}}}, trans = 0x0}
>         __FUNCTION__ = "mod_init"
> #13 0x000000000058f59d in init_mod (m=0x7ffff6cb3740) at sr_module.c:966
>         __FUNCTION__ = "init_mod"
> #14 0x000000000058f8a2 in init_modules () at sr_module.c:995
>         t = 0x7ffff77ac500
>         i = 1187628493
>         __FUNCTION__ = "init_modules"
> #15 0x00000000004aa2b0 in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffe528) at
> main.c:2501
>         cfg_stream = 0xa94020
>         c = -1
>         r = 32767
>         tmp = 0x7ffff7ffd000 ""
>         tmp_len = 32767
>         port = -7008
>         proto = 32767
>         options = 0x7023e0
> ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:"
>         ret = -1
>         seed = 39348307
>         rfd = 8
>         debug_save = 0
>         debug_flag = 0
>         dont_fork_cnt = 0
>         n_lst = 0xf0b2ff
>         p = 0xbf <Address 0xbf out of bounds>
>         __FUNCTION__ = "main"
>
> 2014-10-20 18:11 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com
> <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>:
>
>     What are the differences between the server that works and the one
>     that doesn't? I mean hardware and operating system details?
>
>     Checking quickly the source code and comparing with logs, it
>     doesn't reveal any problem -- it is about allocation of the next
>     fragment, which was not used at all before, after the one
>     allocated previously. The only reason I can think of it right now
>     is corrupted memory or faulty OS.
>
>     Daniel
>
>
>     On 20/10/14 11:56, 张顺通 wrote:
>>     4.2 have the same problem.
>>     at begin i use 4.1, i think this is a bug in 4.1;  then i use 4.2
>>     to check to see if the problem is solved. problems still in.
>>
>>     see ka_4_2_0.log
>>>>      ka_4_2_0.log
>>     <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5x1TDtoeVvAckdMbDRmT3E3UjA/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>>>
>>     2014-10-20 17:48 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:shuntongzhang at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>         ka.log is genrate by kamailio 4.1.6.
>>
>>         2014-10-20 17:44 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>         <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>             Are you using 4.1 or 4.2?
>>
>>             Because the subject mentioned 4.2 but the version of
>>             kamailio is 4.1
>>
>>             Daniel
>>
>>             On 20/10/14 11:39, 张顺通 wrote:
>>             > -M 12 can not help. all config is same.
>>             >
>>             > see ka.log in attachment, kamailio version is 4.1.6
>>             >
>>             > version: kamailio 4.1.6 (x86_64/linux) 010d57
>>             >
>>             > flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
>>             USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>>             > DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM,
>>             SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
>>             > DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT,
>>             USE_DNS_CACHE,
>>             > USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST,
>>             HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>             >
>>             > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
>>             MAX_LISTEN 16,
>>             > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
>>             >
>>             > poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et,
>>             sigio_rt, select.
>>             >
>>             > id: 010d57
>>             >
>>             > compiled on 16:48:03 Oct 20 2014 with gcc 4.1.2
>>             >
>>             >
>>
>>             --
>>             Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>             http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
>>             <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
>>             http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>>
>
>     -- 
>     Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>     http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20141020/9b41194d/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list