[SR-Users] Can "presence" module handle publish reqs with several dialog entries?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Mon May 5 17:37:26 CEST 2014


Can you try with the latest version 4.1.x? It is where I looked in the 
code and seemed to walk through all dialog nodes.

Cheers, Daniel

On 05/05/14 16:28, Klaus Feichtinger wrote:
> this is the output (in this example version 3.2.4) in debug level 3 
> after receiving a PUBLISH request (incl. forming the NOTIFY request):
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [event_list.c:350]: start event= [dialog/5]
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [publish.c:349]: SIP-If-Match header not found
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [presentity.c:85]: etag= a.1399299676.23439.2.0 / 22#012
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [publish.c:358]: new etag  = a.1399299676.23439.2.0
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [publish.c:383]: Expires header found, value= 1800
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [publish.c:468]: KLAUSDBG - body = <?xml 
> version="1.0"?>#015#012<dialog-info 
> xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dialog-info" version="00000000004" 
> state="full" entity="sip:117103 at 172.31.60.87">#015#012<dialog 
> id="CBE263FF-CEAE11E3-80E8CCBC-52135ACA at 172.31.60.13" 
> call-id="CBE263FF-CEAE11E3-80E8CCBC-52135ACA at 172.31.60.13" 
> direction="recipient">#015#012<state>terminated</state>#015#012<remote>#015#012<identity>sip:1101015004 at 172.31.60.13</identity>#015#012<target 
> uri="sip:1101015004 at 172.31.60.13"/>#015#012</remote>#015#012<local>#015#012<identity>sip:117103 at 172.31.60.87</identity>#015#012<target 
> uri="sip:117103 at 172.31.60.87"/>#015#012</local>#015#012</dialog>#015#012<dialog 
> id="1041054395-29684904-1398759995534 at 172.31.60.53" 
> call-id="1041054395-29684904-1398759995534 at 172.31.60.53" 
> direction="initiator">#015#012<state>confirmed</state>#015#012<remote>#015#012<identity>sip:117101 at 172.31.60.87</identity>#015#012<target 
> uri="sip:117101 at 172.31.60.87"/>#015#012</remote>#015#012<local>#015#012<identity>sip:117103 at 172.31.60.87</identity>#015#012<target 
> uri="sip:117103 at 172.31.60.87"/>#015#012</local>#015#012</dialog>#015#012</dialog-info>#015#012 
>
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [hash.c:470]: pres_uri= sip:116001 at 10.16.48.44
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [presentity.c:385]: inserting 8 cols into table
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [presentity.c:99]: send 200OK reply
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [presentity.c:100]: etag= a.1399299676.23439.2.0 - len= 22
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:1041]: querying database table = active_watchers
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:1116]: found 1 dialogs
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:122]: #012#011[pres_uri]= 
> sip:116001 at 10.16.48.44#012#011[to_user]= 116001#011[to_domain]= 
> 10.16.48.44#012#011[w_user]= 117700#011[w_domain]= 
> 10.16.48.14#012#011[event]= dialog#012#011[status]= 
> active#012#011[expires]= 889#012#011[callid]= 
> 1146821297#011[local_cseq]=1#012#011[to_tag]= 
> 4f7a7e54f75c89f5b968c90011d693b5-8c7d#011[from_tag]= 
> 154174339#012#011[contact]= 
> sip:117700 at 10.16.48.14:5070#011[record_route]=
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:1333]: found 1 dialogs( 1 in database and 0 in hash_table)
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:782]: Event requires aggregation
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: 
> presence_dialoginfo [notify_body.c:67]: [pres_user]=116001 
> [pres_domain]= 10.16.48.44, [n]=1
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: 
> presence_dialoginfo [notify_body.c:107]: [pres_user]=116001 
> [pres_domain]= 10.16.48.44, [n]=1
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: 
> presence_dialoginfo [notify_body.c:199]: node type: Element, name: dialog
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: 
> presence_dialoginfo [notify_body.c:73]: [n_body]=0xb7a6daa4
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: 
> presence_dialoginfo [notify_body.c:76]: [*n_body]=<?xml 
> version="1.0"?>#012<dialog-info 
> xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dialog-info" version="00000000000" 
> state="full" entity="116001 at 10.16.48.44">#012  <dialog 
> id="CBE263FF-CEAE11E3-80E8CCBC-52135ACA at 172.31.60.13" 
> call-id="CBE263FF-CEAE11E3-80E8CCBC-52135ACA at 172.31.60.13" 
> direction="recipient">#012<state>terminated</state>#012<remote>#012<identity>sip:1101015004 at 172.31.60.13</identity>#012<target 
> uri="sip:1101015004 at 172.31.60.13"/>#012</remote>#012<local>#012<identity>sip:117103 at 172.31.60.87</identity>#012<target 
> uri="sip:117103 at 172.31.60.87"/>#012</local>#012</dialog>#012</dialog-info>#012 
>
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: 
> presence_dialoginfo [notify_body.c:328]: replace version with "1"
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:1651]: updating subscription to database
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:1468]: dialog info:
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:122]: #012#011[pres_uri]= 
> sip:116001 at 10.16.48.44#012#011[to_user]= 116001#011[to_domain]= 
> 10.16.48.44#012#011[w_user]= 117700#011[w_domain]= 
> 10.16.48.14#012#011[event]= dialog#012#011[status]= 
> active#012#011[expires]= 889#012#011[callid]= 
> 1146821297#011[local_cseq]=1#012#011[to_tag]= 
> 4f7a7e54f75c89f5b968c90011d693b5-8c7d#011[from_tag]= 
> 154174339#012#011[contact]= 
> sip:117700 at 10.16.48.14:5070#011[record_route]=
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:236]: expires = 889
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:1562]: headers:#012Max-Forwards: 70#015#012Event: 
> dialog#015#012Contact: 
> <sip:10.16.48.44:5060>#015#012Subscription-State: 
> active;expires=870#015#012Content-Type: 
> application/dialog-info+xml#015#012
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:964]: CONTACT = sip:117700 at 10.16.48.14:5070
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:1724]: === 22/6/37
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: INFO: presence 
> [notify.c:1593]: NOTIFY sip:117700 at 10.16.48.14 via 
> sip:117700 at 10.16.48.14:5070 on behalf of sip:116001 at 10.16.48.44 for 
> event dialog
> May  5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence 
> [notify.c:1689]: completed with status 200 
> [to_tag:4f7a7e54f75c89f5b968c90011d693b5-8c7d]
>
> Main visible difference is the xml body output between PUBLISH 
> (publish.c) and NOTIFY (notify_body.c).
> regards,
> Klaus
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> hat am 5. Mai 2014 um 
>> 13:27 geschrieben:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I haven't meet that case yet, but xml aggregation in 
>> presence_dialoginfo seems to walk through all children of root note 
>> for each xml doc. Maybe you can post here the output with debug=3.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 05/05/14 13:17, Klaus Feichtinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> during simulating scenarios in relation with the notify problem I 
>>> have so far, I became unsure, if Kamilio (in principal) is 
>>> supporting handling of PUBLISH requests (event "dialog") that 
>>> contain _more than_ one (1) dialog entry. I know that it can 
>>> generate notify requests with a message body that contains more than 
>>> one dialog entry. But that´s not automatically the same as handling 
>>> publish requests....
>>> So - is Kamailio able or not? Did anybody ever use it in such a 
>>> scenario?
>>> regards,
>>> Klaus
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org  <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20140505/53e47966/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list