[SR-Users] bug in textops module

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 14/03/14 21:18, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> Is it really about textops module, because the logs are from siputils,
>> or I am missing something obvious?
> sorry, my bad. it was late in the evening and i wrote wrong module
> name.  it is siputils where the bug is.
Actually this is a more generic topic, because most of the functions as 
well as many parameters can take pseudo-variables. The pseudo-variables 
are spread across lot of modules, therefore at the end is about how 
config is written.

Just for example, based on such logic, lcr should depend on all modules 
that export variables because the parameters of its functions take 
pseudo-variables.

However, so far dependencies in the readme were listing the modules to 
which are internal bindings to access their functions/values. In this 
case is no direct binding from siputils to pv. The pv framework is in 
the core and it is what siputils uses, but the implementation of the avp 
as pseudo variable is in pv module.

On the other hand, personally I have nothing against to enhance docs to 
better reflect this. Feel free to add as you consider more suggestive.
Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 2-4, 2014, Berlin, Germany
http://www.kamailioworld.com