[SR-Users] geoip crash

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

I pushed more safety checks for this case. Can you give it another try 
with the patch from the master (along with the older one)?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 03/03/14 21:35, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> No, but you can do it and if all goes fine, it can be pushed to remote
>> repository. I don't have a geoip deployment at hand these days.
> i backported the patch to my 4.1 source and still got a crash (i don't
> remember if this is the same or new one).
>
> -- juha
>
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0  pv_get_geoip (msg=0xb72316a4, param=0xb6fe0ce4, res=0xbfb622fc)
>      at geoip_pv.c:332
> 332				return pv_geoip_get_strzval(msg, param, res,
> (gdb) where
> #0  pv_get_geoip (msg=0xb72316a4, param=0xb6fe0ce4, res=0xbfb622fc)
>      at geoip_pv.c:332
> #1  0x080d7714 in pv_get_spec_value (msg=0xb72316a4, sp=0xb6fe0cd8,
>      value=0xbfb622fc) at pvapi.c:1266
> #2  0x080a6841 in lval_pvar_assign (h=0xbfb6272c, msg=0xb72316a4,
>      lv=0xb6fe097c, rv=0xb6fe0cd0) at lvalue.c:345
> #3  0x080a6ecc in lval_assign (h=0xbfb6272c, msg=0xb72316a4, lv=0xb6fe097c,
>      rve=0xb6fe0ccc) at lvalue.c:410
> #4  0x080665e3 in do_action (h=0xbfb6272c, a=0xb6fe1080, msg=0xb72316a4)
>      at action.c:1478
> #5  0x08067293 in run_actions (h=0xbfb6272c, a=0xb6fe1080, msg=0xb72316a4)
>      at action.c:1599
> #6  0x0806797a in run_top_route (a=0xb6fe1080, msg=0xb72316a4, c=0x0)
>      at action.c:1685
> #7  0x080e2973 in receive_msg (
>      buf=0x9df95e8 "REGISTER sip:test.tutpro.com SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.98.102.30:5064;branch=z9hG4bK7db1d82ab09c855c;rport\r\nContact: <sip:0x9c447b8 at 192.98.102.30:5064;transport=tcp>;expires=600;+sip.instance=\"<ur"..., len=616,
>      rcv_info=0xb4b2a33c) at receive.c:211
> #8  0x08162874 in receive_tcp_msg (
>      tcpbuf=0xb4b2a4f4 "REGISTER sip:test.tutpro.com SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.98.102.30:5064;branch=z9hG4bK7db1d82ab09c855c;rport\r\nContact: <sip:0x9c447b8 at 192.98.102.30:5064;transport=tcp>;expires=600;+sip.instance=\"<ur"...,
>      len=616, rcv_info=0xb4b2a33c, con=0xb4b2a328) at tcp_read.c:1232
> #9  0x08163624 in tcp_read_req (con=0xb4b2a328, bytes_read=0xbfb62ae0,
>      read_flags=0xbfb62adc) at tcp_read.c:1387
> #10 0x081649be in handle_io (fm=0xb7530ba8, events=1, idx=-1)
>      at tcp_read.c:1559
> #11 0x0815deb9 in io_wait_loop_epoll (h=0x82d60c0, t=2, repeat=0)
>      at io_wait.h:1092
> #12 0x081658ba in tcp_receive_loop (unix_sock=42) at tcp_read.c:1728
> #13 0x08158ae3 in tcp_init_children () at tcp_main.c:4959
> #14 0x080adcee in main_loop () at main.c:1702
> #15 0x080b088f in main (argc=17, argv=0xbfb62ef4) at main.c:2533

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda