[SR-Users] Is t_on_failure with uac_req_send possible?

[Ian Lin]

Hello Daniel,

Thanks for your quick response.

I was using onreply_route[idx] {} block so it wasn't work and after
changing to use default reply route and it works.

Appreciated.

Cheers,
Ian



On 13 June 2014 17:53, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hello,
>
> failure route is not executed for local generated requests because it
> requires a transaction created by a network-received request.
>
> The response is getting in the default reply_route {} block, but it is not
> getting into tm specific onreply_route[X] {} blocks.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 13/06/14 07:11, Ian Lin wrote:
>
> Hi Klaus,
>
>  I've got the same problem on kamailio-4.1.0 and I couldn't see the sip
> messages reach to onreply route while using uac_req_send.
>
>  Could you please give me a hint about this? Thanks!
>
>  Cheers,
> Ian
>
>  --
> ------------------------
> Ian Lin     林于巽
> ------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>


-- 
------------------------
Ian Lin     林于巽
------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20140613/e1aaf518/attachment.html>