[SR-Users] append_branch and t_replicate issue

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

The second one is with the patch to the code and it is enough to pick 
only that one.

The first one is for docs (readme file), which is not really necessary 
to test (main reason to split the commit, because patches to docs 
typically throw conflicts when backporting, due to different formatting 
of whitespacing by vaiorus OSes).

Daniel

On 25/07/14 14:24, Asgaroth wrote:
> On 25/07/2014 12:04, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> I read the condition on uri wrong -- it was only on a null pointer 
>> for the uri, not on length (in this case pointer is to a empty 
>> string). I pushed an enhanced check for length as well, but it is 
>> only in master for the moment.
>
> ok, I will try to cherry pick it back to 4.1
>
> Is it these 2 that I need to get back in to 4.1:
>
> commit 1be7c3ebc9b29046c023290ad580bb83c3e6e44d
> Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
> Date:   Fri Jul 25 12:01:37 2014 +0200
>
>     tm: docs - added note about t_replicate() without params
>
> commit c5b6b6021e75cd4e73f54f9131524b588709950c
> Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
> Date:   Fri Jul 25 11:58:50 2014 +0200
>
>     tm: enable t_replicate() without any parameter
>
>     - r-uri or dst-uri will be used for sending out
>
> Thanks
> Bruce

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda