[SR-Users] parallel forking and 30x

[Andrew Pogrebennyk]

Daniel,

we do seem to have a problem here, the get_redirects() function can be
used from the FAILURE_ROUTE only, not from per branch failure route
("Command cannot be used in the block").
Does it mean that uac_redirect module needs an update?

Andrew

On 02/18/2014 10:38 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> starting with 4.1, you can have per branch failure routing block:
> 
> http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_on_branch_failure
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> 
> On 18/02/14 10:28, Andreas Granig wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is the intended behaviour from a general point of view if you get a
>> 1xx on one branch and a 30x on another branch for a parallel fork?
>>
>>  From my understanding, the 30x is a final reply, so it's kept in tm
>> until all other branches are finished, then it enters failure-route with
>> the highest error code (e.g. a 487 if you cancel the other branch).
>>
>> What I actually want is intercepting the 30x and send another INVITE to
>> the Contact of the 30x in the failure route. This works fine if you only
>> have one branch, but it doesn't enter failure route for 30x if you have
>> another active branch (e.g. in ringing state). Would it be possible to
>> create a new branch directly from the reply route, or force to enter
>> failure route for a specific reply/branch?
>>
>> Andreas