[SR-Users] parallel forking and 30x

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

starting with 4.1, you can have per branch failure routing block:

http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_on_branch_failure

Cheers,
Daniel

On 18/02/14 10:28, Andreas Granig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the intended behaviour from a general point of view if you get a
> 1xx on one branch and a 30x on another branch for a parallel fork?
>
>  From my understanding, the 30x is a final reply, so it's kept in tm
> until all other branches are finished, then it enters failure-route with
> the highest error code (e.g. a 487 if you cancel the other branch).
>
> What I actually want is intercepting the 30x and send another INVITE to
> the Contact of the 30x in the failure route. This works fine if you only
> have one branch, but it doesn't enter failure route for 30x if you have
> another active branch (e.g. in ringing state). Would it be possible to
> create a new branch directly from the reply route, or force to enter
> failure route for a specific reply/branch?
>
> Andreas
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda