[SR-Users] Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS

Shankar shankar.rk at plintron.com
Mon Feb 3 07:33:36 CET 2014


Hi Alex,

 

We set the hash size to 32 MB and found that the hash size is not the same
as configured one. At the max it was taking 64KB. 

 

Regards,

Shankar

 

 

Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:27:29 -0500

From: Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>

To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org

Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS

Message-ID: <52EF28C1.5010204 at evaristesys.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

 

On 02/03/2014 12:22 AM, Shankar wrote:

 

> Also we found that in ?dialog.c? the variable dlg_hash_size should be

> ?unsigned int?. Hope this will be taken care in next release of Kamailio.

 

How did you arrive at that conclusion?

 

-- 

Alex Balashov - Principal

Evariste Systems LLC

235 E Ponce de Leon Ave

Suite 106

Decatur, GA 30030

United States

Tel: +1-678-954-0670

Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

 

 

From: Shankar [mailto:shankar.rk at plintron.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 10:53 AM
To: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
Mailing List'
Subject: Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS

 

Hello,

 

Can anyone brief about MAX_LDG_LOCKS in dlg_hash.c? 

 

Should I increase the value of MAX_LDG_LOCKS (hardcoded to 2048) if the hash
size is increased?

 

Also we found that in 'dialog.c' the variable dlg_hash_size should be
'unsigned int'. Hope this will be taken care in next release of Kamailio.

 

Regards,

Shankar



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20140203/a341b40b/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list