[SR-Users] Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS
Shankar
shankar.rk at plintron.com
Mon Feb 3 07:33:36 CET 2014
Hi Alex,
We set the hash size to 32 MB and found that the hash size is not the same
as configured one. At the max it was taking 64KB.
Regards,
Shankar
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:27:29 -0500
From: Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS
Message-ID: <52EF28C1.5010204 at evaristesys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On 02/03/2014 12:22 AM, Shankar wrote:
> Also we found that in ?dialog.c? the variable dlg_hash_size should be
> ?unsigned int?. Hope this will be taken care in next release of Kamailio.
How did you arrive at that conclusion?
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
From: Shankar [mailto:shankar.rk at plintron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 10:53 AM
To: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
Mailing List'
Subject: Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS
Hello,
Can anyone brief about MAX_LDG_LOCKS in dlg_hash.c?
Should I increase the value of MAX_LDG_LOCKS (hardcoded to 2048) if the hash
size is increased?
Also we found that in 'dialog.c' the variable dlg_hash_size should be
'unsigned int'. Hope this will be taken care in next release of Kamailio.
Regards,
Shankar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20140203/a341b40b/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list