[SR-Users] Kamailio Truncating timestamp of sip message?

[Heenan, Timothy Steven]

Greetings,

I've recently run into a rather strange issue where, in response to an INVITE sent by Kamailio, I'm receiving a 183 Session Progress and SIP 200 OK response about .000050 seconds apart  (.05 miliseconds) .

Kamailio is choosing to forward the SIP 200 OK ahead of the 183, as if they had arrived at the same time and is prioritizing the 200.


Is there a truncate limit on timestamp values? Is this possibly adjustable?


Thank you in advance,
-Tim

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20141210/6ecf184b/attachment.html>