[SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

the patches were backported to 4.2 and 4.1 branches already, meaning
they will be part of 4.2.2.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 03/12/14 14:05, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
>
> Hello Daniel,
>
>  
>
> You're right. I patched nat_traversal… Sorry.
>
> I applied the patch on nathelper and msg_translator.
>
>  
>
> It works fine now, thank you!
>
>  
>
> You will port the patch into 4.2.2?
>
> Regards,
>
>  
>
> Igor.
>
>  
>
> *De :*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda at gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 3 décembre 2014 09:01
> *À :* Igor Potjevlesch
> *Cc :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
> *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
>
>  
>
> Hello,
>
> the patch you pasted doesn't seem to be to nathelper module. Be sure
> you get the one from core as well.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
> On 02/12/14 18:44, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>      
>
>     Yes, second option.
>
>     Here is the diff between current module and the original one:
>
>      
>
>     823c823
>
>     <     different_ip = received_via_test(msg);
>
>     ---
>
>     >     different_ip = received_test(msg);
>
>      
>
>     Regards,
>
>      
>
>     Igor.
>
>      
>
>     *De :*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda at gmail.com]
>     *Envoyé :* mardi 2 décembre 2014 09:54
>     *À :* Igor Potjevlesch
>     *Cc :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
>     *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or
>     rtpproxy
>
>      
>
>     Hello,
>
>     did you update to latest version in the branch or you applied the
>     patches?
>
>     If first option, then give me the output of 'kamailio -v'.
>
>     If second, can you send the patch that resulted for you, because
>     there were two commits?
>
>     Cheers,
>     Daniel
>
>     On 02/12/14 08:46, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
>
>         Hello Daniel,
>
>
>         Thank you for the patch.
>
>          
>
>         I tried it (change received_test() by received_via_test()),
>         but the result is the same.
>
>         The INVITE was the same than the one already sent.
>
>          
>
>         Regards,
>
>          
>
>         Igor.
>
>  
>
>
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20141204/fcb884c6/attachment.html>