[SR-Users] cnxcc serial fork

[Carlos Ruiz Díaz]

Hi Kelvin,

this is an interesting scenario. I will have to reproduce it myself in
order to reply you properly.

Answering your question, yes, it should be updated to 200. Let me check
ASAP.

Regards,
Carlos




On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Kelvin Chua <kelchy at gmail.com> wrote:

> hi carlos,
>
> i have a serial forking scenario to several providers as failover. and i
> used cnxcc_set_max_credit to control the session credit/time.
>
> just wanted to make sure it does what i think it should do so i made a
> little experiment.
> the logic goes this way.
> 1. cnxcc_set_max_credit -> $100, cost per second -> $1
> 2. call will fail, try the next provider
> 3. cnxcc_set_max_credit -> $200, cost per second -> $2
>
> what i am expecting to see is, if i do
>
> kamctl kamcmd cnxcc.active_clients
>
> i would see $200 as the max_amount. but in kamailio 4.1.5, i still see
> $100, should it
> be updated to $200? is there an override in cnxcc_set_max_credit when
> called twice or after failure_route?
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>


-- 
Carlos
http://caruizdiaz.com
http://ngvoice.com
+52 55 3048 3303
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20140828/2102ca82/attachment.html>