[SR-Users] Minimal configuration without database support

Frank Carmickle frank at carmickle.com
Wed Aug 27 15:28:40 CEST 2014


On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:48 AM, Eugene Prokopiev <enp at itx.ru> wrote:

>>> Have SEMS any advantages over FreeSWITCH for topology hiding?
>> 
>> More narrow and specialised use-cases, so you don't have to deal with
>> stripping it of PBX and miscellaneous application features. It's more of a
>> dedicated B2BUA (with its sbc module), in this case.
> 
> I tried to use SEMS but I've got error, which was reported about 2
> years ago without any decision -
> http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/sems/2014-August/004451.html
> 
You will have no problem doing this on Freeswitch.  Stripping down FS from it's default config is not hard.  I like to rewrite the entire config organizing it for the intended purpose.  Thinking through what you want to do, write it down and then rewrite the config.  Just because FS has lots of features doesn't mean you need to use them.  It's not hard to disable them.


--FC





More information about the sr-users mailing list