[SR-Users] Send socket and sequential requests
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Wed Aug 13 17:03:20 CEST 2014
Hello,
On 13/08/14 16:28, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My proxy is bound to a.b.c.d:5060 and secondarily to e.f.g.h:5060.
>
> Most traffic comes into a.b.c.d:5060 and is relayed out that
> interface. Some initial INVITEs are routed out of e.f.g.h:5060, forced
> via $fs. The problem is that the Record-Route header still reflects
> a.b.c.d:5060 and that sequential messages from both ends end up
> entering and exiting a.b.c.d:5060. Many endpoints don't like that; for
> instance, e2e ACKs from the caller that come from a.b.c.d:5060 while
> the initial INVITE came from e.f.g.h:5060 can be a problem in that
> they are not matched by some UASs.
>
> What is the best way to approach this? Is this something covered by
> Kamailio's 'mhomed' core param?
if you force a different outbound socket than inbound, then the
record_route() should add two headers -- doesn't happen like that? If
yes, can you provide a trace?
Btw, is any of these sockets bound to a virtual network interface?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 - http://www.asipto.com
Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA
More information about the sr-users
mailing list