[SR-Users] sdpops and rtpproxy/rtpengine

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 07/08/14 15:52, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> You did not invoke rtpproxy symmetrically on replies? Or just not sdpops?
just not sdpops. My specific need was removing video and then the 
replies don't come with a video offering anymore. It is very likely to 
be the same for codecs. Hoever, the msg_apply_changes() should work with 
replies for latest version (or at least is on master).

Cheers,
Daniel
>
>
> On 7 August 2014 06:22:11 GMT-04:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> To conclude here, it should work if you call msg apply changes, so the
>> sdp body is built again. I use this in a prototype deployment and seems
>>
>> all going well. I did it only for requests, though.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 07/08/14 00:08, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>> Sorry, I didn't see the previous thread about this very issue. That
>>> was a dumb post. The question arose entirely coincidentally.
>>>
>>> On 08/06/2014 06:06 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is it safe to use sdpops and the rtpproxy* modules together, given
>> that
>>>> the latter modify SDP? In other words, can I prune some codecs
>> first,
>>>> and then call rtpproxy_offer()? Is it safe?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>
> --
> Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully fledged keyboard.
>
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
> Suite 106
> Decatur, GA 30030
> United States
> Tel: +1-678-954-0671
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 - http://www.asipto.com
Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA