[SR-Users] Kamailio - RTPProxy - Asymmetric RTP

Lucas Girard lgirard at commpartner.net
Thu Oct 31 20:56:12 CET 2013


Yes Daniel, you are right.
Thats behavior is supposed to be Asymmetric RTP? Because I can not find
definitions about which ports should be used.


On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 16:18 +0100, Daniel Grotti wrote:

> Hi Girard,
> 
> looks like the Provider are sending RTP from port 5392 instead of 5394
> as in SDP, rtpproxy send traffic to 5392 as well.
> 
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/31/2013 04:13 PM, Lucas Girard wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have an issue with a Kamailio and rtpProxy, when Asymmetric RTP is used. 
> > 
> > I have the system running, lines registered in Kamailio are able to call
> > to several destinations, but I have a problem with one provider that use
> > Asymmetric RTP (others providers use Symmetric RTP and I dont have any
> > issues).
> > 
> > A -----> Kamailio & RTPProxy ----------> Trunk -------> Provider
> > (Asymmetric RTP) -------> B
> > 
> > A is calling B.
> > The problem is that line in kamailio A can listen to B, but B can not
> > listen what A says.
> > 
> > I have captured the sip dialog and rtp traffic and I can see that:
> > 
> > Kamailio tells to provider that is using the port 52388 (media port in SDP).
> > Providers tells Kamailio that is using the port 5394 (media port in SDP).
> > RTP traffic from Providers to kamailio goes from port 5392 to 52388.
> > RTP traffic from Kamailio to Provider goes from port 52388 to 5392.
> > 
> > 
> > I have not found an RFC regarding Asymmetric RTP. The question are,
> > why RTP is sent from Kamailio (rtpproxy) to Provider to destination port
> > 5392?
> > It should use 5394 as SDP indicate?
> > or, port 5392 is learned when RTP traffic was received from 5392 to 52388?
> > 
> > 
> > /# kamailio -V/
> > /version: kamailio //*3.3.0 (i386/linux)*/
> > /flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
> > USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP,
> > PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
> > USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES/
> > /ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB/
> > /poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select./
> > /id: unknown/
> > /compiled on 22:17:07 Jun 18 2012 with gcc 4.4.5/
> > 
> > /# rtpproxy -v/
> > */Basic version: 20040107/*
> > /Extension 20050322: Support for multiple RTP streams and MOH/
> > /Extension 20060704: Support for extra parameter in the V command/
> > /Extension 20071116: Support for RTP re-packetization/
> > /Extension 20071218: Support for forking (copying) RTP stream/
> > /Extension 20080403: Support for RTP statistics querying/
> > /Extension 20081102: Support for setting codecs in the update/lookup
> > command/
> > /Extension 20081224: Support for session timeout notifications/
> > 
> > 
> > I hope to be clear with this explanation.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Lucas Girard
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131031/7a8baa87/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list