[SR-Users] cnxcc module insufficient credit

[Jayesh Nambiar]

Hey Carlos,
I would test and get back.

--- Jayesh
On Jul 29, 2013 7:27 PM, "Carlos Ruiz Díaz" <carlos.ruizdiaz at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jayesh,
>
> I just applied the changes and updated the documentation. Please give it a
> try.
>
> Regards,
> Carlos
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Jayesh Nambiar <jayesh1017 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Thank you Carlos.
>>
>> --- Jayesh
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz <
>> carlos.ruizdiaz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok. Right now I'm short in time but this weekend I'm gonna schedule
>>> myself this.
>>>
>>>  I'll let you know.
>>>
>>> Carlos.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jayesh Nambiar <jayesh1017 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reply Carlos. Checking before relaying the call is how I
>>>> am doing it right now but it feels like it would have been more neater if
>>>> done in the cnxcc module itself since it is anyways checking the credit
>>>> after the call is active !!
>>>>
>>>> I would wait for that behavior though in the cnxcc module. Thanks again.
>>>>
>>>> --- Jayesh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz <
>>>> carlos.ruizdiaz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jayesh,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, I think this behavior can be added.
>>>>>
>>>>> As a workaround you can check the credit data before relaying the
>>>>> INVITE so you can reject it immediately in case of lacking enough credit.
>>>>> Have you tried that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Carlos.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jayesh Nambiar <jayesh1017 at gmail.com
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> I was testing out the cnxcc module and it works well for prepaid
>>>>>> credit handling. One problem that I saw with the module is that if the
>>>>>> credit is insufficient it still allows the call to pass and then disconnect
>>>>>> within a second.
>>>>>> Is it possible that if the credit is insufficient for the call, the
>>>>>> dialog can be terminated before the call is placed with a 4xx kind of
>>>>>> response !! Just a thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- Jayesh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>>>>>> list
>>>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carlos
>>>>> http://caruizdiaz.com
>>>>> +595981146623
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos
>>> http://caruizdiaz.com
>>> +595981146623
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos
> http://caruizdiaz.com
> +595981146623
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20130730/ee9d371c/attachment-0001.html>