[SR-Users] rtpproxy behind NAT

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 7/7/13 5:42 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> I've seen a lot of discussions about running rtpproxy behind NAT.
> The fact is that standard vanilla rtpproxy can run behind NAT without
> any issues (no patches required).
> A few things must be addressed:
>   - the proper ports must be forwarded from the public IP to the private IP;
>   - when calling rtpproxy_offer/answer, the second parameter must be
> properly populated with the external public IP for streams from public
> network.
>
> I hope this brings some light over this highly debated topic.
the stock one works fine in the simple scenario of one rtpproxy. But not 
when needing to bridge between two interfaces as well as when working 
with a farm of (load balanced) rtpproxies.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda