[SR-Users] Sending CANCEL

[Alex Balashov]

On 07/04/2013 04:03 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:

> I haven't tested this function so I don't know which parts of this
> that happens automagically in TM in the transaction context. I would
> assume that the 200 OK is handled properly and the 487 is forwarded
> only if there are not other branches that hasn't received a final
> response. This you will have to test. I would be happy if you report
> your findings back to the list!

This is what I had in mind when I said this was a bad idea.  I still 
think it's likely to result in a complete mess, nice TM function or not.

-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/