[SR-Users] Testing SIP Outbound / RFC5626 (Was: Freezing for next major release)

[Peter Dunkley]

Hi Richard,

I haven't been directly involved with the coding of the registrar stuff.
This does sound like testing worth doing.

Also worth adding tests to check that if you get a 430 back after
routing to one reg-id you can try the next.

Peter

On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 12:54 +0000, Richard Brady wrote:

> Hi Peter
> 
> 
> 
> Great work on this! We'd like to help you test.
> 
> 
> The test I have in mind, which we could create using SIPp, would be to
> register multiple contacts with the same instance-id (i.e.
> "sip.instance" param) but different reg-id params. Then send an INVITE
> to that AoR and make sure the forking is only per instance-id and not
> per reg-id. This could be repeated in multiple permutations of
> instance-ids and reg-ids.
> 
> 
> This would be a test of save() and lookup() more than anything else.
> Is that what you had in mind?
> 
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 3 January 2013 14:13, Peter Dunkley
> <peter.dunkley at crocodile-rcs.com> wrote:
> 
>         I hope to get the outbound edge proxy and flow timer stuff
>         into master by Monday, but it could really do with some
>         additional testing especially in conjunction with the reg-id
>         stuff in registrar/usrloc (which I have no idea how to use).
>         
>         Peter
>         
>         
>         
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


-- 
Peter Dunkley
Technical Director
Crocodile RCS Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20130107/3b8c4a5f/attachment.htm>