[SR-Users] t_reply in failure route with dialog module
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Fri Dec 27 23:22:04 CET 2013
Hello,
do you get also a log message like:
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:794]: log_next_state_dlg(): bogus event 4
in state 5 for dlg ... ?
The warning itself should be harmless. Maybe you can grab all the log
messages with debug=3, that will help to get more hits about what happens.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/12/13 06:35, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> was this issue resolved?
> I encountered this issue also (4.0.5), in failure_route, i used
> t_reply("404","not found")
> never sent out, instead i get this in logs,
> WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1564]: t_unref(): WARNING: script writer
> didn't release transaction
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the backtrace is ok for the moment. I will look over it and come
> back with results.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 11/25/13 12:10 PM, Efelin Novak wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> sorry it took me more than I expected. Is this sufficient?
>> Meanwhile I found out that this happens when fr_inv_timer
>> triggers and dialog module is turned on.
>>
>> Backtrace:
>>
>> bt
>> #0 futex_release (lock=0xb4b90798) at ../../mem/../futexlock.h:137
>> #1 next_state_dlg (dlg=dlg at entry=0xb4bc5a38,
>> event=event at entry=4, old_state=old_state at entry=0xbfef08a0,
>> new_state=new_state at entry=0xbfef089c,
>> unref=unref at entry=0xbfef08a4) at dlg_hash.c:950
>> #2 0xb6b05479 in dlg_onreply (t=0xb4bc5ce8, type=1048576,
>> param=0xbfef097c) at dlg_handlers.c:469
>> #3 0xb6cc2336 in run_trans_callbacks_internal
>> (cb_lst=0xb4bc5d28, type=type at entry=1048576, trans=0xb4bc5ce8,
>> params=params at entry=0xbfef097c) at t_hooks.c:290
>> #4 0xb6cc25da in run_trans_callbacks_with_buf
>> (type=type at entry=1048576, rbuf=rbuf at entry=0xb4bc5d54,
>> req=req at entry=0xb4bc6a08, repl=repl at entry=0xffffffff,
>> flags=flags at entry=505) at t_hooks.c:336
>> #5 0xb6cee953 in _reply_light (trans=trans at entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
>> buf=0xb731f588 "SIP/2.0 505 Error\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 192.168.21.4;branch=z9hG4bKa6f5.8ca73657.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 10.0.0.95;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKBc143aFe81jDj\r\nFrom:
>> \"USER\" <sip:USER at 10.0.0.95
>> <mailto:sip%3AUSER at 10.0.0.95>>;t"..., len=len at entry=434,
>> code=code at entry=505, lock=0, bm=0xbfef0e48, to_tag_len=<error
>> reading variable: Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xfa>,
>> to_tag=<error reading variable: Unhandled dwarf expression
>> opcode 0xfa>) at t_reply.c:628
>> #6 0xb6ceedeb in _reply (trans=0xb4bc5ce8, trans at entry=0x1f9,
>> p_msg=p_msg at entry=0xb731f568, code=505, text=0xb731f568 "Error",
>> lock=0) at t_reply.c:782
>> #7 0xb6ceefd7 in t_reply_unsafe (t=0x1f9, t at entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
>> p_msg=0xb731f568, p_msg at entry=0xb6d196c0, code=0,
>> text=text at entry=0xb731f568 "Error") at t_reply.c:1531
>> #8 0xb6cd6904 in w_t_reply (msg=0xb6d196c0, p1=0xb731c988
>> "8]0\267\001", p2=0xb731c9b8 "8P0\267 ") at tm.c:1283
>> #9 0x080651cf in do_action (h=h at entry=0xbfef1258,
>> a=a at entry=0xb7305d98, msg=msg at entry=0xb6d196c0) at action.c:1080
>> #10 0x08064137 in run_actions (h=h at entry=0xbfef1258,
>> a=a at entry=0xb73053c8, msg=msg at entry=0xb6d196c0) at action.c:1573
>> #11 0x0806cedd in run_top_route (a=0xb73053c8,
>> msg=msg at entry=0xb6d196c0, c=c at entry=0x0) at action.c:1658
>> #12 0xb6ceba98 in run_failure_handlers (t=t at entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
>> rpl=0xffffffff, code=408, extra_flags=96) at t_reply.c:1028
>> #13 0xb6cece22 in t_should_relay_response
>> (Trans=Trans at entry=0xb4bc5ce8, new_code=new_code at entry=408,
>> branch=branch at entry=0, should_store=should_store at entry=0xbfef1464,
>> should_relay=should_relay at entry=0xbfef1460,
>> cancel_data=cancel_data at entry=0xbfef1510,
>> reply=reply at entry=0xffffffff) at t_reply.c:1304
>> #14 0xb6cef076 in relay_reply (t=t at entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
>> p_msg=p_msg at entry=0xffffffff, branch=branch at entry=0,
>> msg_status=msg_status at entry=408,
>> cancel_data=cancel_data at entry=0xbfef1510,
>> do_put_on_wait=do_put_on_wait at entry=0) at t_reply.c:1707
>> #15 0xb6cc28b4 in fake_reply (t=t at entry=0xb4bc5ce8, branch=0,
>> code=code at entry=408) at timer.c:354
>> #16 0xb6cc34b0 in final_response_handler (t=0xb4bc5ce8,
>> r_buf=0xb4bc5dc8) at timer.c:526
>> #17 retr_buf_handler (ticks=272914717, tl=0xb4bc5ddc, p=0x3e8) at
>> timer.c:584
>> #18 0x08183325 in timer_list_expire (slow_mark=12,
>> slow_l=0xb49f2438, h=0xb49f2338, t=272914717) at timer.c:894
>> #19 timer_handler () at timer.c:959
>> #20 timer_main () at timer.c:998
>> #21 0x080b8c65 in main_loop () at main.c:1709
>> #22 0x08063bfe in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfef1844) at main.c:2566
>>
>> (I have changed USER and IP address to hide my network :))
>>
>> After this when I hit 'n' multiple times I got following output
>> in infinite loop:
>>
>> 22 0x08063bfe in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfef1844) at main.c:2566
>> (gdb) n
>> next_state_dlg (dlg=dlg at entry=0xb4bc5a38, event=event at entry=4,
>> old_state=old_state at entry=0xbfef08a0,
>> new_state=new_state at entry=0xbfef089c,
>> unref=unref at entry=0xbfef08a4) at dlg_hash.c:952
>> 952 LM_DBG("dialog %p changed from state %d to "
>> (gdb)
>> 955 }
>> (gdb)
>> dlg_onreply (t=0xb4bc5ce8, type=1048576, param=0xbfef097c) at
>> dlg_handlers.c:470
>> 470 dlg_run_event_route(dlg, (rpl==FAKED_REPLY)?NULL:rpl,
>> old_state, new_state);
>> (gdb)
>> 472 if (new_state==DLG_STATE_EARLY) {
>> (gdb)
>> 479 if (new_state==DLG_STATE_CONFIRMED_NA &&
>> (gdb)
>> 540 if ( new_state==DLG_STATE_DELETED
>> (gdb)
>> 542 || old_state==DLG_STATE_EARLY) ) {
>> (gdb)
>> 541 && (old_state==DLG_STATE_UNCONFIRMED
>> (gdb)
>> 559 if (unref) dlg_unref(dlg, unref);
>> (gdb)
>> 563 dlg_release(dlg);
>> (gdb)
>> 565 }
>> (gdb)
>> run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0xb4bc5d28,
>> type=type at entry=1048576, trans=0xb4bc5ce8,
>> params=params at entry=0xbfef097c) at t_hooks.c:292
>> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
>> (gdb)
>> 283 while(cbp){
>> (gdb)
>> 286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
>> (gdb)
>> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
>> (gdb)
>> 283 while(cbp){
>> (gdb)
>> 286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
>> (gdb)
>> 287 DBG("DBG: trans=%p, callback type %d, id %d
>> entered\n",
>> (gdb)
>> 290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
>> (gdb)
>> 289 params->param = &(cbp->param);
>> (gdb)
>> 290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
>> (gdb)
>> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
>> (gdb)
>> 283 while(cbp){
>> (gdb)
>> 286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
>> (gdb)
>> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
>> (gdb)
>> 283 while(cbp){
>> (gdb)
>> 286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
>> (gdb)
>> 287 DBG("DBG: trans=%p, callback type %d, id %d
>> entered\n",
>> (gdb)
>> 290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
>> (gdb)
>> 289 params->param = &(cbp->param);
>> (gdb)
>> 290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
>> (gdb)
>> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
>> (gdb)
>> 283 while(cbp){
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Efelin
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/20 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com
>> <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I will investigate more -- meanwhile had some traveling. It
>> would speed up if you can send the backtrace of one process
>> that blocks when you applied the patch.
>>
>> You need to connect with gdb to it:
>>
>> gdb /path/to/kamailio _PID_
>>
>> replace _PID_ with the pid of blocked kamailio process.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 11/15/13 5:50 PM, Efelin Novak wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> thanks for a reply. I applied the patch and now the Kamailio
>>> just prints
>>>
>>> WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1564]: t_unref(): WARNING: script
>>> writer didn't release transaction
>>>
>>> and than freezes without any log. It does not resend the
>>> incoming "winning" failure reply neither response to any
>>> other messages, not even to a new calls. It just freezes.
>>> All kamailio processes are running and eating the whole
>>> 4-core processor.
>>>
>>> Restart of Kamailio solves this problem.
>>>
>>> Any ideas how to continue with debug?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Efelin
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/15 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> can you try attached patch?
>>>
>>> Let me know if all goes fine and I will commit it to the
>>> repository.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/15/13 10:25 AM, Efelin Novak wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> when I use t_reply("505", "Error"); in my failure
>>>> route, the response is not forwarded and following is
>>>> written into a log:
>>>>
>>>> kamailio[26216]: WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1559]:
>>>> t_unref(): WARNING: script writer didn't release
>>>> transaction
>>>>
>>>> plus next line is written exactly 416000 times into a
>>>> log afterwards:
>>>>
>>>> kamailio[32685]: CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:794]:
>>>> log_next_state_dlg(): bogus event 4 in state 5 for dlg
>>>> 0xb4af6588 [2575:7017] with clid '121d44f0-6555f4c8'
>>>> and tags 'd12546d053aadc68o2' ''
>>>>
>>>> My point is to change the incoming code from users and
>>>> append a Q.850 reason code.
>>>> Is there any other way how to do this or a way how to
>>>> fix this?
>>>> I'm using Kamilio 4.0.4 on Debian 7.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The code is as follows:
>>>> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]
>>>> {
>>>> if (t_is_canceled()) {
>>>> exit;
>>>> }
>>>> if($T_reply_code == 408 && isflagset(10))
>>>> {
>>>> xlog("Ringing timeout");
>>>> append_to_reply("Reason: Q.850;cause=28\r\n");
>>>> t_reply("505", "Error");
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
>>> - more details about Kamailio trainings athttp://www.asipto.com -
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
>>> sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
>> - more details about Kamailio trainings athttp://www.asipto.com -
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
> list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131227/e263cc90/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list