[SR-Users] Missing Route headers in locally generated BYE
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Wed Dec 11 09:38:20 CET 2013
Carsten,
On 12/11/2013 03:36 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:
> why should Kamailio add a route for himself to an outbound request?
> 172.30.105.18 is obviously the proxy itself; so adding the
> Route-Header makes no sense.... (at least from a SIP-Perspective).
>
> Record-Route: <sip:172.30.105.18;lr=on;ftag=ervXH3ycHcgpK;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--;proxy_media=yes;dlgcor=fa8.9ea>
>
> 03:27:37.464071 IP 172.30.105.18.5060 > 172.30.105.20.5060: SIP, length: 367
>
> Or am i missing something here?
That depends, philosophically, on whether the intention of this feature
is to spoof BYEs so that they appear to come from the respective UAs
toward each other through the proxy (or, in substance, act as if they
were), or for Kamailio to unexpectedly take on the role of a UAC
mid-call. :-)
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
More information about the sr-users
mailing list