[SR-Users] Missing Route headers in locally generated BYE

Alex Balashov abalashov at evaristesys.com
Wed Dec 11 09:38:20 CET 2013


Carsten,

On 12/11/2013 03:36 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:

> why should Kamailio add a route for himself to an outbound request?
> 172.30.105.18 is obviously the proxy itself; so adding the
> Route-Header makes no sense.... (at least from a SIP-Perspective).
>
> Record-Route: <sip:172.30.105.18;lr=on;ftag=ervXH3ycHcgpK;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--;proxy_media=yes;dlgcor=fa8.9ea>
>
> 03:27:37.464071 IP 172.30.105.18.5060 > 172.30.105.20.5060: SIP, length: 367
>
> Or am i missing something here?

That depends, philosophically, on whether the intention of this feature 
is to spoof BYEs so that they appear to come from the respective UAs 
toward each other through the proxy (or, in substance, act as if they 
were), or for Kamailio to unexpectedly take on the role of a UAC 
mid-call.  :-)

-- Alex

-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/



More information about the sr-users mailing list