[SR-Users] IPv4, IPv6, RTPProxy and Kamailio

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Maybe you look at all debug messages. Try with debug=2 even for 
WITH_DEBUG enabled.

Otherwise, the cfgtrace just prints for each executed action the config 
file name, line and action id/name

If that is too complex for you to look at and compare with the config 
file logic and see where is going on a different execution path than you 
would expect, then probably I cannot help more.

Daniel

On 12/4/13 1:20 PM, Mark Zeman wrote:
> We are using WITH_DEBUG, so we did see the cfgtraces, but they are
> wholly incomprehensible to us, I'm sorry to say.
>
> On Wed 04 Dec 2013 01:11:26 PM CET, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> On 12/3/13 5:17 PM, Mark Zeman wrote:
>>> The SIP packets are fine - we are able to establish SIP session with a
>>> secured control channel as easily as with an unsecured one.
>>> As long as the RTPProxy doesn't get involved (i.e. as long as it's
>>> IPvX-IPvX and not IPv4-IPv6) everything works!
>>> With the RTPProxy, the connection gets established (SIP still works)
>>> but RTP only comes from one side, the caller, and even that is not
>>> relayed.
>>>
>>> It appears that Kamailio doesn't even enter the route[IPV4V6] part of
>>> its config, for example...
>> If the config file is not executing the lines you would expect, then
>> enable cfgtrace for debugger module and the details about executed
>> lines will be printed in syslog. That should help to identify which
>> condition is not satisfied to get to what you want to be executed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>> I will be able to send logs tomorrow, but I can show you our config, if
>>> that might help.
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda