[SR-Users] options_reply()

[Olle E. Johansson]

22 aug 2013 kl. 10:37 skrev Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>:

> On 08/22/2013 04:34 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> 
>> 22 aug 2013 kl. 10:27 skrev Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>:
>> 
>>> On 08/22/2013 04:25 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Guessing that a URI with a user name should be forwarded to that
>>>> address. URIs pointing to the domain of the server should be
>>>> responded by the server.
>>> 
>>> Yes, but shouldn't sip:user at proxy_ip and sip:proxy_ip both be serviced by the server?
>> 
>> If it's to an IP address I would answer 404 Not Found to both, SIP is domain based :-)
>> 
>> user at ip is propably a 404, but yes, if a UA use this for keepalive we should propably
>> answer - but in that case you don't really need a full options answer, just any
>> 200 Ok will do. Or?
> 
> Sure, which is why the stateless 200 OK solution works.
> 
> But it seems to me that options_reply() ought to answer with a 404 Not Found;  it's what other UASs (like Asterisk) do...
The Asterisk answer depends on your dialplan :-)

/O