[SR-Users] usrloc + multimaster replication

[Juha Heinanen]

Alex Balashov writes:

> The 'location' table is also replicated this way. We know that 'usrloc' 
> doesn't work so well with this: one instance of Kamailio will 
> periodically delete the other's contacts, even if they have a nonlocal 
> SIP domain.

> Is there any db_mode that can be used (other than 0/purely in-memory) to 
> make this work right?  Or is that the essential problem that p_usrloc is 
> written to solve?

have you tried with db_mode=3?  i have not noticed problems with it, but
my case be different from yours.

-- juha