[SR-Users] rtpproxy delete fails

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 10/19/12 9:11 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> why is that? in failure_route I call rtpproxy_mange() which calls
>> unforce_rtp_proxy() which destroys the initiated session.
> as explained in earlier messages of this thread, the situation unused
> rtp sessions pile up happens, e.g., when call parallel forks and some
> forks that needed rtpproxy respond negatively, e.g., with 480, and one
> responses with 200.  thus failure route never gets called that would
> allow you to destroy the initiated session.
But in this case the call is completed, because negative response codes 
are absorbed by tm, 200ok being sent back, so no need to destroy any rtp 
session. iirc, for all branches of a parallel fork there is one rtp 
session in rtpproxy (cannot tell about other media relays).

Cheers,
Daniel


-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat
Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu