[SR-Users] t_branch_timeout()

Alex Balashov abalashov at evaristesys.com
Mon Nov 19 17:46:00 CET 2012

I don't have an explicit value set, and did not know about this 
parameter.  So, I suppose it defaults to 0.

What should I set it to to get the correct reply from every failed 
branch in failure_route?

On 11/19/2012 04:13 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

> Hello,
> what value you have for failure_reply_mode parameter of tm?
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> On 11/14/12 3:12 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> I am using the latest pull of branch 3.3, and t_branch_timeout()
>> doesn't work if the previous branch resulted in a reply (i.e. a
>> negative final reply).
>> That is to say, t_branch_timeout() == FALSE on a genuine timeout, as
>> long as the preceding branch provided a result (such as 404).
>> t_branch_timeout() == TRUE if this is a timeout, on the first branch.
>> In other words, it appears that if t_any_replied() == TRUE, then
>> t_branch_timeout() == FALSE, even for this branch, and even if the
>> branch really did time out (no response at all from destination).
>> That's not how the documentation says it should behave.  Am I doing
>> something wrong?  If so, how do I find out if _this particular_ branch
>> timed out, from the failure_route[]?
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

More information about the sr-users mailing list