[SR-Users] how to use "t_drop_replies" but keep the last reply for acc

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

With latest stable you should be able to execute acc_db_request() for the reply in onreply_route. Then it should take the totag from reply.

When doing in failure route, it processes the incoming invite that has no totag.

Cheers,
Daniel

--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com

On 8 Nov 2012, at 10:17, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> OK, i do not use drop reply.
> I do fork the call to the secondary destination.
> Still, I need this (busy/no_answer) reply to be inserted into the acc table.
> Ho do i do that?
> I tried acc_db_request() but the to_tag is missing and the sip_code is missing as well.
> How do i force the sip_code to be the one i generated or received? how do i use the to_tag from the last reply i got (183 for example)?
> I know i can probably save the to_tag and the sip_code, use update with sqlops or on the other hand do everything in the database afterwards - but this is very tricky and i think not efficient.
> So, any way to write the reply i do not send to the caller to the DB with the 183 to_tag and the relevant sip_code?
> Thanks,
> Uri
> 
> 
>  
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks.
> I am doing the reroutes on the failure route. I am using drop reply to prevent the caller from receiving the 4xx reply from the first destination. If i would just t_relay with the new deatination, the 4xx will not be forward to the caller?
> 
> בתאריך 7 בנוב 2012 18:46, מאת "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:
> 
> As I said I can not comment on the accounting, but dropping replies to forward the request to another destination is the wrong approach. Sequential forking should be done in a failure route.
> 
> Klaus
> 
> On 07.11.2012 17:31, Uri Shacked wrote:
> So if I wont use the drop reply I might get what I need?
> 
> בתאריך 7 בנוב 2012 18:10, מאת "Klaus Darilion"
> <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at <mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>>:
> 
>     Ingoring accounting, such "sequential forking" scenarios are usually
>     solved by having the forkin logic in a failure-route.
> 
>     - 1st callee sends 486
>     - failure route is executed, if winning response is 486, set the new
>     destination and t_relay().
> 
>     I do not know how this single transaction with 2 branches is
>     reflected in the acc table, but I guess you can implement any acc
>     behavior using manual accounting.
> 
>     regards
>     Klaus
> 
>     On 07.11.2012 16:29, Uri Shacked wrote:
> 
>         To be more accurate - I am using the "t_set_fr()" it generates
>         408 and
>         sends cancel to the destination.
> 
>         This is the case that i do not see a final reply for the first
>         invite.
> 
> 
> 
>         On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com
>         <mailto:ushacked at gmail.com>
>         <mailto:ushacked at gmail.com <mailto:ushacked at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> 
>              Hi,
>              I am trying to make an option of "route when no answer" or
>         " route
>              when busy".
>              What I am doing is checking the reply and if "busy", for
>         example, I
>              use "t_drop_replies". Then, I set the new number and
>         route[relay] again.
>              On the accdb table, I get the first invite with 183 and
>         after that
>              the second invite with 183 and with 200.
>              I would like to do exactly what i do, but would like to see
>         on the
>              accdb the 486 reply from the first invite.
>              how do i do it?
>              BR,
>              Uri
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         _________________________________________________
>         SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
>         mailing list
>         sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>         http://lists.sip-router.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-__users <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20121110/f0e4a703/attachment.htm>