[SR-Users] how to use "t_drop_replies" but keep the last reply for acc

[Klaus Darilion]

Ingoring accounting, such "sequential forking" scenarios are usually 
solved by having the forkin logic in a failure-route.

- 1st callee sends 486
- failure route is executed, if winning response is 486, set the new 
destination and t_relay().

I do not know how this single transaction with 2 branches is reflected 
in the acc table, but I guess you can implement any acc behavior using 
manual accounting.

regards
Klaus

On 07.11.2012 16:29, Uri Shacked wrote:
> To be more accurate - I am using the "t_set_fr()" it generates 408 and
> sends cancel to the destination.
>
> This is the case that i do not see a final reply for the first invite.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com
> <mailto:ushacked at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>     I am trying to make an option of "route when no answer" or " route
>     when busy".
>     What I am doing is checking the reply and if "busy", for example, I
>     use "t_drop_replies". Then, I set the new number and route[relay] again.
>     On the accdb table, I get the first invite with 183 and after that
>     the second invite with 183 and with 200.
>     I would like to do exactly what i do, but would like to see on the
>     accdb the 486 reply from the first invite.
>     how do i do it?
>     BR,
>     Uri
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>