[SR-Users] rtpproxy and timeout notification

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 5/24/12 11:36 AM, Laurent Schweizer wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I see the new timeout notification feature from the rtpproxy when no 
> voice traffic is detected.
>
do you mean the patch from the rtpproxy module?

> I have 2 questions regarding this timeout notification:
>
> 1)When a timeout is detected  and kamailio send the BYE  is that 
> possible to manipulate the BYE before he is sent to add maybe an extra 
> header that indicate that the call was stopped due to a timeout issue ?
>

The attempts so far to get this done were by sending mi/rpc command to 
dialog module, which can take a parameter with extra headers, see for 
example:

http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/dialog.html#id2555056

> 2)If a user put the call on hold (with a=recvonly or maybe old way 
> IP=0.0.0.0.0) what will happens (the music on hold is not generated by 
> rtpproxy but by another server) ? he will detect this as a timeout ?
>
>                Is that possible to indicate to rtpproxy that for a 
> moment stream will be only in one way ?
>

Personally I don't have the insights for these questions, maybe someone 
else can answer. I expect there should be anyhow a timeout (maybe 
higher) even for such case, not to get the endless call dead in on-hold 
state.

Cheers,
Daniel

> Best regards
>
> Laurent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120525/8c5fb490/attachment.htm>