[SR-Users] FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

[Charles Chance]

Hi Daniel,

 

I have sent the messages over to you.

 

I look forward to hear what you can find.

 

Best,

 

Charles

 

  _____  

From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda at gmail.com] 
Sent: 17 May 2012 15:06
To: Charles Chance
Cc: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -Users
Mailing List'
Subject: Re: FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

 

Hello,

the content of ps->param is pretty much all invalid. So looks like a
callback on a freed/invalid parameter, could be a double-callback execution.

Set debug=3 and send all the messages for such case -- it might be quite a
lot of them, so send them to my email address, the mailing list has a limit
of message size.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 5/17/12 2:13 PM, Charles Chance wrote:

Hi,

 

Requested output as follows:

 

(gdb) frame 1

#1  publ_cback_func (t=0xb3dc8e38, type=1024, ps=0xbfcdd5d8)

    at send_publish.c:246

246             hash_code= core_hash(hentity->pres_uri, NULL, HASH_SIZE);

(gdb) p *ps

$2 = {req = 0x0, rpl = 0xb7c30340, param = 0xb3dc3ff4, code = 412, flags =
0,

  branch = 0, t_rbuf = 0x0, dst = 0x0, send_buf = {s = 0x0, len = 0}}

(gdb) p *(ua_pres_t*)(*ps->param)

$3 = {id = {s = 0x20455942 <Address 0x20455942 out of bounds>,

    len = 980445555}, pres_uri = 0x40323531, event = 875444279,

  expires = 875703856, desired_expires = 858861105, flag = 808794676,

  db_flag = 1394618421, cb_param = 0x322f5049, next = 0xa0d302e,

  ua_flag = 979462486, etag = {

    s = 0x50495320 <Address 0x50495320 out of bounds>, len = 808333871},

  tuple_id = {s = 0x5044552f <Address 0x5044552f out of bounds>,

    len = 775436064}, body = 0x322e3034, content_type = {

    s = 0x312e3134 <Address 0x312e3134 out of bounds>, len = 1648047155},

  watcher_uri = 0x636e6172, call_id = {

    s = 0x397a3d68 <Address 0x397a3d68 out of bounds>, len = 1647593320},

  to_tag = {s = 0x3435634b <Address 0x3435634b out of bounds>,

    len = 842149473}, from_tag = {

    s = 0x63306461 <Address 0x63306461 out of bounds>, len = 808334648},

  cseq = 1767246349, version = 1394621025, outbound_proxy = 0x322f5049,

  extra_headers = 0x552f302e, record_route = {

    s = 0x31205044 <Address 0x31205044 out of bounds>, len = 825111097},

  remote_contact = {s = 0x312e3836 <Address 0x312e3836 out of bounds>,

    len = 976498224}, contact = {

    s = 0x36373135 <Address 0x36373135 out of bounds>, len = 1701985073}}

 

 

Yes, it is a test server so very happy to arrange for remote access if
required. In the meantime, I will do a little more digging to try to find
out why entity is null.

 

Cheers,

 

Charles

 





-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5004 - Release Date: 05/16/12

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120517/fc6b63c3/attachment.htm>