[SR-Users] Proxy Registrations offset port
Robert
robert at inteli-core.com
Tue Mar 20 22:36:22 CET 2012
I've spent a significant amount of time now jacking with configurations
Maybe I should re-state what I'm trying to do
I'm trying to establish an SBC / UpperRegistration SBC
The goal is to listen on a port other than 5060 and relay the registration
to the actual proxy.
I.e. IP Phone ---> Kamailio (port 8080) ----> Sip proxy (port 5060)
I've tried all combinations of rewritehostport / t_replicate etc
The best I get is an attempt to register followed by an unauthorized with
request for digest auth..
I don't want to store any credentials in Kamailio I just want to act as an
offset port for users who cannot reach 5060
OpenSBC was working for this however the registrations were timing out and
not renewing
From: Reda Aouad <reda.aouad at gmail.com>
Reply-To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
Users Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:16:14 +0100
To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -Users
Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Proxy Registrations offset port
No wonder your signallin is not reaching the final client.
I didnt't suggest to throw OpenSips. NAT handling is delicate woth proxies.
Start by looking at some wireshark dump to see what's wrong.
Reda
On 9 mars 2012, at 16:57, Robert <robert at inteli-core.com> wrote:
> Two different tests I completed:
>
> Test #1 it showed the opensips server
> Test #2 it showed the client's public ip address
>
> The issue is not as much RTP but I'm not getting SIP signaling back to the
> client.. Which leads me to believe the NAT problem. I'm not even getting
> ringing
>
> Maybe I should go ahead and install Kamailio and throw out the OpenSIPs stuff
>
>
>
> From: Reda Aouad <reda.aouad at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
> Users Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:41:57 +0100
> To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -Users
> Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Proxy Registrations offset port
>
> Kamailio's default conf is really a good place to start, you just have to
> disable the authentication, by commenting the corresponding route.
>
> You can start by looking at a wireshark/tcpdump dump on your PortaOne server
> to know where the rtp stream is going, and then troubleshoot accordingly..
>
> On your PortaOne server, what is the location of registered users? Is it their
> IP@, or that of OpenSips server?
>
> Reda
>
> On 9 mars 2012, at 16:28, Robert <robert at inteli-core.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you so much for answering.. The folks at the other place don't want to
>> help.
>>
>> We have a PortaOne SIP platform It does everything It's listening on port
>> 5060 public ip..
>>
>> We want to deploy Kamailio or some derivative of SER to listen on PUBLIC port
>> other than 5060 for our customers who cannot reach 5060.
>>
>> Using a very simple rewritehostport statement I was successful in getting
>> the registration to pass through. I.e. Registered my Aastra and X-Lite to
>> port 8080 and saw registration in PortaOne.
>>
>> I do not want K/SER to do actual auth / registration I.e. I do not care who
>> tries to use it I want final registration to be PortaOne That's why I
>> think the simple rewritehostport worked well. OpenSIPS was not doing any auth
>> just simply passing it on.
>>
>> Our PortaOne was handling RTP Proxy so during an outbound call I was
>> getting 2 way audio no problem.
>> However when an inbound call would come in from PortaOne it was being
>> delivered to OpenSIPS and looks like Opensips was reporting 401 Unauthorized.
>>
>> The Aastra / X-Lite are NAT It's possible that either I need to look at
>> nathlper closer or that I misconfigured something somewhere.
>>
>> I guess I'm not fluent enough in the configs and options to get a good
>> config.
>>
>>
>> From: Reda Aouad <reda.aouad at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
>> Users Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:45:14 +0100
>> To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
>> Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Proxy Registrations offset port
>>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> I had the same feeling about O***sips community.....
>>
>> I have a similar setup. A proxy that listens on port other than 5060,
>> forwarding to other servers on 5060.
>> If you can better define better your problem with your setup, maybe we can
>> help you better.
>>
>> Is your server listening only on one port 8080? Is your server behind NAT or
>> does it have a public IP @ on the interface it's listening on? What is the
>> exact problem with inbound calls? Are you doing record-route? Do you forward
>> only registrations, or are your handling invites as well? What server listens
>> on port 5060? Another Kamailio server? Does it handle clients behind NAT?
>>
>> You should know that Kamailio is a SIP server, not a PBX/sofswitch/SBC as
>> Asterisk or Freeswitch.
>> If you define better your problem, and send me your config file (by private
>> email if you like), I may look at it.
>>
>> Reda
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 15:32, Robert <robert at inteli-core.com> wrote:
>>> I've been playing with OpenSIPS and am willing to change over if it means
>>> I'll get a more informed answer from this community..
>>>
>>> I need to set up a proxy forwarding server that can listen on a port other
>>> than 5060 I.e. 8080 and forward the registration requests to another Voip
>>> platform we have that is running on 5060.
>>>
>>> I've been able to this under OpenSIPS but I'm having issues with inbound
>>> calls. It could be a NAT issue.
>>>
>>> Basically listen on 8080 forward any and all registrations to x:5060
>>> which I've done using rewritehostport
>>>
>>> Anyone have any good example configs for this? I'm a n00b at this OpenSER
>>> stuff but have been around asterisk / freeswitch / portaone for a while.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and
>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
>> info/sr-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and
> Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
> nfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and
Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120320/1228b7a6/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list