[SR-Users] loose_route() with pre-loaded Route in ACK

[Andreas Granig]

On 02/29/2012 06:23 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> That's really weird. It should not rewrite $ru. Maybe there is some
> special handling for ACK.

Yeah, I'm going to check the source.

> Anyway, if the Route header is consumed and pushed into $du it means
> that the "special behavior" which was done for the INVITE
> (loose-route==0) is not used here. IIRC these special behavior is only
> triggered if the request does not contain a to-tag.

Right, and this is explicitely stated in the docs.

> If tm is used, it will take care of this by consuming the ACK and
> generating a new one. It seems that we need some fixes for stateless
> routing.

I already switched back to transaction stateful routing for now until I
get a better idea about what's going on on my test machine.

Andreas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120229/a29fef32/attachment.pgp>