[SR-Users] [OT] the role of SBCs

Andreas Granig agranig at sipwise.com
Fri Aug 31 11:52:42 CEST 2012


On 08/31/2012 11:10 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> Sbc also ofer a propritary way of failover for itself
>> If node1 die node2 will replace it
> 
> That's been done both with Asterisk and Kamailio (and propably SEMS) for a very long time.

For SEMS it's a commercial module, same goes for the Sipwise mediaproxy
for seemless RTP stream fail-over. That's still where open source people
earn their money :)

Andreas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120831/1ab3a339/attachment.pgp>


More information about the sr-users mailing list